We use cookies to show content based on your preferences. If you continue to browse you accept their use and installation. More information. >

FMF - Friends of Minerals Forum, discussion and message board
The place to share your mineralogical experiences


Spanish message board






Newest topics and users posts
27 Mar-19:47:08 Re: 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Pete Richards)
27 Mar-16:15:44 Re: 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Cfrench58)
27 Mar-15:18:59 Re: 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Alfredo)
27 Mar-14:39:29 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Cfrench58)
27 Mar-05:21:48 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Mim Museum)
27 Mar-05:03:26 Re: trying to find information on rose/pink quartz and tourmaline associations. (Ning)
27 Mar-02:39:50 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Tobi)
27 Mar-00:23:28 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
26 Mar-00:53:41 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
25 Mar-13:32:10 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
25 Mar-00:25:58 The mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
23 Mar-13:35:22 Re: collection of firmo espinar (Firmo Espinar)
22 Mar-08:32:28 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
22 Mar-04:20:41 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Mim Museum)
21 Mar-22:49:19 Re: green seam. Looks like it in a state of decay. (Ning)
21 Mar-22:47:40 Re: green seam. Looks like it in a state of decay. (Ning)
21 Mar-22:45:25 Re: green seam. Looks like it in a state of decay. (Ning)
21 Mar-15:34:23 Re: the mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
21 Mar-14:35:08 Re: jim’s mineral collection (Jim Wilkinson)
21 Mar-14:15:36 The 4th phoenix heritage mineral show (phms) hosted by mineralogical society of arizona (m (Chris Whitney-smith)
21 Mar-04:36:10 Re: the mizunaka collection (Tobi)
21 Mar-04:11:47 Re: jim’s mineral collection (James Catmur)
20 Mar-23:34:15 The mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
20 Mar-18:13:16 Re: jim’s mineral collection (Jim Wilkinson)
20 Mar-14:06:43 Re: dry gill mine, caldbeck fells, cumbria, uk (Forrestblyth)

For lists of newest topics and postings click here


RSS RSS

View unanswered posts

Why and how to register

Index Index
 FAQFAQ RegisterRegister  Log inLog in
 {Forgotten your password?}Forgotten your password?  

Like
111802


The time now is Mar 28, 2024 08:30

Search for a textSearch for a text   

A general guide for using the Forum with some rules and tips
The information provided within this Forum about localities is only given to allow reference to them. Any visit to any of the localities requires you to obtain full permission and relevant information prior to your visit. FMF is strictly against any illicit activities related to collecting minerals.
"What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance
  Goto page 1, 2  Next
  Index -> The Ten Thousand Club
Like


View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Tracy




Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 551
Location: Toronto


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 10:34    Post subject: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

...This post has been brewing in my mind for about 6 months, and 2 weeks ago I finally had time to put it in writing. And today I am able to post it. It's editorial-like but I'm hoping you will find it interesting, and that it will spark some conversation.

- Tracy

***

I am trying to understand the importance placed on the provenance of a specimen. In truth I find the concept baffling and frustrating. Personally, I value a mineral for what it is, and less for where it has “travelled.” And yet, the phenomenon of touting a specimen’s history, and using this information to inflate a specimen’s value, appears to be gaining in popularity.

It has become common on seller websites and FMF postings to read that an item is “from the ABC collection.” I wonder, is a specimen made better by the fact that it once belonged to ABC, and should I be paying more for it because of its former owner? With the exception of highly revered, great names in mineralogical history, who is ABC anyway? More often than not, I have no idea. It suggests that a key part of my mineral education is to learn about the names, attributes and stories of every collector on the planet, both living and dead. I doubt I’ll ever achieve that.

If the fact that a specimen belonged to ABC is pertinent, some context of why this information adds value should, at the very least, be included in the listing. What does it mean to collectors like me to obtain an ABC specimen? What if ABC is highly renowned, but had collecting interests completely different from mine? What if we have completely different tastes? And why did ABC, however great he or she is, decide to part with the specimen I'm viewing?

Provenance can be meaningful on a sentimental level. Consider a specimen which was formerly in the hands of one collector or dealer who sold/traded it to another and then got it back years later. I think this is a nice story for the people involved. However, to me, as an outsider, it is just a story. It doesn’t affect me, and isn’t even all that interesting without a personal connection. It has been suggested that knowing the provenance can help you learn about the dealers ABC liked to do business with, and where he or she travelled in search of specimens. Does this mean anything to me, though? Not really.

When I consider whether or not to buy a specimen, what matters most to me is the piece’s condition, the quality of the crystals, the esthetics, and the price. Provenance is only a consideration if I know enough about the former owner to recognize his or her eye for quality.

I understand that not everyone feels as I do about provenance and would welcome other FMFers’ thoughts on this topic.

***

_________________
"Wisdom begins in wonder" - Socrates
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

keldjarn




Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 157


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 10:54    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

Tracy wrote:
... Not really.

When I consider whether or not to buy a specimen, what matters most to me is the piece’s condition, the quality of the crystals, the esthetics, and the price.

***


If you add: "and the locality and locality information provided with the specimen" , I think most collectors would agree. For rare minerals that may not be easily identified by sight alone, precise information about the means of identification may also be important. In this context the provenance of the specimen may contribute to support a correct ID (or in some cases make it questionable)..

I always keep old labels and note the provenance of specimens in my collection catalogue. But when faced with a choice between two desirable specimens of the same mineral(s) from the same locality, I always select the best qualiy specimen I can afford. Provenance will rarely influence my decision.

Knut
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

chris
Site Admin



Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 538
Location: Grenoble


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 11:00    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

Hello Tracy,

Interesting editorial. To answer your request, the notoriety of the previous owner of a specimen I'm interested in is not my first criteria. Like you, I'll rely on condition, interest, price... Many mineral specimens belonged to other collectors (known or anonymous like me) before being passed from collection to collection. And even if I have a few of them coming from well known collectors I do not make the point at mentioning it, neither on FMF nor at home when showing my collection. However when such specimen comes to my collection, I keep a record of it. If one day I want to pass it to someone else, this person will be free to keep recording it or to just forget about it.

Would I accept to spend more money because of the notoriety of its previous owner ? Certainly not.

Cheers

Christophe
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

John Nash




Joined: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 34
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 11:31    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

I think of myself as a curator of my specimens; the provenance is part of the specimen. I don't pay much more for a specimen "just" because it is from a well-known collector, although perhaps I do for someone who's acquaintance I've enjoyed.

On a more subjective note, I value a specimen that has been through many collections even if I don't know the collectors, simply because it makes me think of and appreciate past people who handled and cared enough to carefully preserve the beautiful mineral specimen. This is particularly true when the labels go back into previous centuries; I have a few from the mid-19th century. The labels also remind one of mines that are long gone, and whole cultures that are long gone. I remind my fellow collectors that the only way that happens is if they faithfully preserve the provenance when possible. I also enjoy the aspect of mineral collecting involving "deep time," knowing something about how and when the specimen I hold was formed adds dimensionality; the provenance provides a related dimension in the much shorter time scales of human interests and lives.

I have some cubic aqua fluorite from an onshore silver mine, the Shuniah in Thunder Bay, Ontario. Does it matter that my then 13 y.o. son Greg found it on the main dump of the deepest shaft (#3) in 1999? Maybe to some? Imagine having a label from the 1800's stating who found your "Bigrigg" calcite, when it was found and which pit it actually cam from? Maybe interesting enough to pay a little extra?

John

_________________
John K. Nash, Ph.D.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jesse Fisher




Joined: 18 Mar 2009
Posts: 628
Location: San Francisco


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 11:54    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

Humans are social animals and social interaction plays a large part in the reasons many people collect minerals (or anything else, for that matter). I think it is safe to assume that there are a lot of mineral collectors who have little or no background in the science of mineralogy, and that these people collect for reasons other than purely scientific curiosity. I'm not a psychologist, but I think it obvious that many collectors are ego-driven to varying extents and that friendly (and sometimes not so friendly) competition is well established among the collector community. If someone owns a specimen that came from someone who has been recognized by the community as a having a high-quality collection, then this adds a certain amount of social credibility to the new owner This can seem to add credibility to the specimen, particularly if the new owner is still enough of a novice at collecting that he/she has not yet firmly established their own sense of aesthetics and a comfortable understanding of what they want in their collection. In other words, it confers a certain amount of "bragging rights" because the specimen has been validated by having been owned by an acknowledged expert collector.

Personally, I think that knowing the history of a specimen - particularly one that has been out of the ground for some time - adds a certain intellectual value to the piece. For me, it doesn't necessarily add a great deal of monetary value unless the former owner was a person or institution of historical importance. To this end, I have on occasion acquired some rather mediocre specimens that I otherwise might have passed on simply because they came with an Arthur Russell label.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Roger Warin




Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 1171


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 11:57    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

Hi ,
Yes this is an interesting topic . As a label with a high price always causes a stir (which may be repulsive) , the dealer can use this trick to attract the attention of people.
Further, referring to a former owner may be appropriate, especially in the case of rare minerals. Even museums are using this medium. Thus in Ste Marie, I photographed a stephanite belonging to Hauy, the great scinentist , the father of crystallography. But the specimen was small, dark, but it was remarkable for the species. Hauy knew that, and he reminded me in June 2013.
Of course, all collectors are not called Rene Just Haüy. But sometimes having shown their collection, they have gained notoriety.
As a result, I like to know the past of a classic old mineral. Many people also collect the various labels that have characterized the mineral.
We can make this comparison. Drinking an old and famous wine gives in principle different taste from that provided by a too acidic and industrial Beaujolais Nouveau often without taste other than cherry.
But we must not fall into the trap away and invent wacky origins. Most minerals are not accompanied by such information. Today, there are more as collections change hands by rotating the generations.
Roger.



Stephanite_70894_R.jpg
 Description:
Stephanite
Fresnillo Mine, Pinos, Zacatecas, Mex.
MNHN_Paris
ex-coll. R.J. Haüy
Wow...
already shown here
 Viewed:  31156 Time(s)

Stephanite_70894_R.jpg


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 4888
Location: Barcelona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 13:57    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

Roger Warin wrote:
...But the specimen was small, dark, but it was remarkable for the species. Hauy knew that, and he reminded me in June 2013...

Many of us we attend major Show where thousands (if not hundred-thousands) specimens are displayed. Is too much for a human mind and frequently we finished overwhelmed, so our mind tends to discard many possibilities in order to allow our neurons survive ;-)

Take labels from previous collectors (famous or not) as a kind of help: someone did a part of the job for you. Maybe he/she did well, maybe not, is your choice to value it, but at least he/she saved for you a lot of time to choice among hundreds/thousands specimens the one which seems to be the most collectible.
Another word is: with the label you get not only the specimen but probably also a lot of effort and time invested by the former owner to select the specimen.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Don Lum




Joined: 03 Sep 2012
Posts: 2854
Location: Arkansas


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 14:21    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

Jordi wrote: "Another word is: with the label you get not only the specimen but probably also a lot of effort and time invested by the former owner to select the specimen."

I agree with you, Jordi. this may be true for those collectors who are new to the market and relatively unsophisticated like I am, who thinks "if this was worthy to be in so-and-so's collection, maybe I should consider it for my collection." I know everyone's tastes differ. Perhaps a dealer just acquired the piece by buying out another collection. However, I also agree with the point of view that paying more for a specimen because of the provenance is not particularly appealing.

_________________
hogwild
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Don Lum




Joined: 03 Sep 2012
Posts: 2854
Location: Arkansas


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 14:24    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

I would also add that I wouldn't mind having Tracy look over my shoulder at a mineral show and tell me what she likes and why. That would be really helpful.

Don

_________________
hogwild
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

alfredo
Site Admin



Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 979


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 14:46    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

I agree with all of Tracy's original post; well said, Tracy!

With regard to Don's comment, "if this was worthy to be in so-and-so's collection, maybe I should consider it for my collection." - Yes, I agree, in cases where the original owner has died and their heirs are distributing the collection. But if the original owner is still alive, I get the opposite feeling, it makes me wonder, "Why are they getting rid of that? Did they just find out that much better ones are available elsewhere? Do I really want something that wasn't good enough for them to keep?" Of course people might have many reasons for selling something, they might just be economically distressed, or trying to concentrate on a narrower field. But I still get the feeling, buying something out of the personal collection of a living person, that I'm getting a castoff, like used clothes. Not so for buying something from a deceased collector.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

newryqs




Joined: 30 Aug 2013
Posts: 44
Location: NY

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 16:53    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

I remember the old Min Rec ad about "old collections" assembled to order. There are a large number of old labels floating about in collections for which there is no specimen. I have blank labels I've acquired over the years going back to Charles Upham Shepard, as well as from other famous collectors, dealers, and museums. I have even more old labels that are written or typed and that are from famous and not so famous sources. False provenance is rather easily created at times. About the only way you can be sure of provenance is if it were historically illustrated and attributed. Otherwise, it's like having a rare mineral that was "analyzed", but you do not have the documents. Even then, there are several anecdotes of people perpetuating a fraud by having a genuine rare mineral tested from an insignificant crumb and then the documents are "married" to a specimen that was not that species. A fraudulent jalpaite specimen that had documents attached to a chalcocite crystal specimen come to mind. The receiver of the fraudulent jalpaite immediately had the specimen re-tested and discovered the fraud. As the purchase price was $25,000 and was paid nearly 30 years ago when that was a lot of money, the owner wished to verify the" provenance" of the identification. Getting a specimen directly from the person who labeled it is also a way to be sure of provenance. After that, it's a lottery. There's frequently an uproar among mineral collectors when a widespread fraud is detected, but fraud is possibly less common than in other collectibles.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jim Robison




Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 55

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 17:22    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

I agree with most of what Tracy said so clearly. Provenance for current living collectors doesn't do a lot for me. Same with a lot of old collections. But there are a couple of exceptions.

The first is when I know a current collector specializes in the same localities and minerals I collect. The fact that the pieces previously made the cut, so to speak, and as noted above, helps me sort out possible acquisitions. And it does not bother me to know that somebody has set aside a piece from their collection. Objectives change over time for most collectors, financial considerations arise, and it can frequently happen that very nice specimens come out of current collections.

I collect Smithsonite from Tsumeb. In the collection are two pieces from the disbursement of the Philadelphia Academy minerals some years back. Both of these specimens have been now traced through the historic collection inventory logs to the Tsumeb mineral collecting efforts of the fairly well known (at least among Tsumeb collectors) Sam Gordon in 1929-1930 in a six-month long expedition to South America and Africa. Clearly dating the timing of these pieces gives clues to their original location in the mine. The fact that they caught the attention of Gordon is significant to me. Does the origin affect the value of the pieces. Likely not much in a monetary sense I am sure, although some dealers would disagree. Does it make the pieces more valuable and interesting to me, most definitely.

Other specimens in the collection with old labels and history also do much to tie down the mine area the rocks came out of. This helps me understand a little better the mineralogy of this fascinating mine.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 4888
Location: Barcelona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 17:41    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

alfredo wrote:
...But if the original owner is still alive, I get the opposite feeling, it makes me wonder, "Why are they getting rid of that? Did they just find out that much better ones are available elsewhere? Do I really want something that wasn't good enough for them to keep?"...

Alfredo,

I have two labels from you and as far as I know you are still alive (at least until when you wrote your message ;-) One of these labels is related with one specimen of my personal collection and the other one is related with one specimen of my inventory and honestly although you are still alive I'm honored with both specimens and their labels.

Is hard to explain, but to me it mean something that a great expert with a so extended knowledge owned some time these two specimens. I agree that it could be not significative for other people but for me it is. Perhaps it could be the "human" part of the rocks... ;-)

_________________
Audaces fortuna iuvat
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Tracy




Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 551
Location: Toronto


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 19:24    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

Don Lum wrote:
I would also add that I wouldn't mind having Tracy look over my shoulder at a mineral show and tell me what she likes and why. That would be really helpful.

Don


Don, I am honored, but would prefer to stand side by side with you in a mineral show and compare notes. I've got lot yet to learn, and you have some really nice specimens. :-)

...It did occur to me this morning after I started this thread that it might be more meaningful if someone were to say "your collection and interests remind me of those of XYZ, do you know about him/her?" - I think personalizing the individual collector could in some way increase the weight I give to provenance.

Thanks all for the great feedback. Please keep writing - I'm enjoying your responses (they are quite thought-provoking) and wish I had time to comment on many things I've read thus far. I will try to sneak in a few remarks over the coming days, though I am traveling on business most of the week.

- Tracy

_________________
"Wisdom begins in wonder" - Socrates
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

alfredo
Site Admin



Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 979


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 19:25    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

And I am honored to have one from you in my collection too, Jordi - a japanese native tellurium, if I remember right. But you and I are dealers; we're "expected" to sell our stones; people get pissed off at us if we don't sell them.

Not the same feeling as a private collector selling a piece; but I do see your point - It's nice to have old labels from friends and people we respect. It increases the sentimental value of the specimen, although I still agree with all those above who stated that it does nothing for the economic value of a stone.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Bob Carnein




Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 325
Location: Florissant, CO


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 19:59    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

The fact is that most mineral specimens have no intrinsic value. The value is whatever we say it is. It's based on a complex web of things that depends on the individual collector's experience and interests. If somebody likes to know the provenance of his or her specimens, then he or she may be willing to pay more for that Who's to judge? Provenance is also a part of the history of our hobby; who's to know what information about a specimen may be of interest to future collectors?

Remember, too, that vanity is involved in mineral collecting, just as it is in almost everything modern human beings do. We may deny it, but most of us want to be remembered after we go back to Mother Earth.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Fiebre Verde




Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 942
Location: Paris Area


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 20:19    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

Every collector has a different profile.

I don’t pay much attention to labels because of the way I assemble my collection (although I do have some labels from you Jordi which I preciously keep along with the minerals I bought from you!). Fortunately I have a job that keeps me traveling and I get the vast majority of my minerals almost directly from the source (sort of). And I work hard to label them… digitally! (for inventory purposes).

At the end of the day, as long as the price is convenient I purely rely on aesthetic criteria where labels cannot be much of a help. The added sentimental bonus might come from the little story behind the transaction but unfortunately this does not seem to happen often enough!
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Don Lum




Joined: 03 Sep 2012
Posts: 2854
Location: Arkansas


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 21:08    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

Tracy wrote:
Don, I am honored, but would prefer to stand side by side with you in a mineral show and compare notes. I've got lot yet to learn, and you have some really nice specimens. :-)...

Thank you, Tracy.

Don

_________________
hogwild
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Greg Lilly




Joined: 05 May 2013
Posts: 75
Location: Tauranga


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 03, 2013 23:00    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

Hello,
This made me think about my own collection and my posts on this forum so here are my thoughts. I personally don't purchase specimens because they have been owned by someone else, I make selections based on criteria which are important to me. If I choose something which has been owned by a previous collector that I know it is an added bonus but not a purchasing criteria. I don't display or promote this information in any way but keep the old labels and note it in my cataloging to give the next owner a more complete picture of the specimens history. I don't think a premium price should be paid because of a previous owner.
A personal exception, on my collection page in this forum I have several New Zealand pieces where I have noted the previous owner or person who collected it. I did this more to 'celebrate' them and the information really only has relevance in NZ. Also, I have done a lot of field collecting locally and I wanted to distinguish those pieces from MY own.
There is definitely some level of bragging value attached to specimens obtained from collectors who are ( or were if they are deceased ) held in high esteem by fellow collectors but that can often only be relevant locally or within a small group of people. That actually makes it more special for me.
Greg
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

crocoite




Joined: 06 Feb 2009
Posts: 487
Location: Ballarat, Victoria


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 04, 2013 02:06    Post subject: Re: "What's in a name?" - thoughts on the subject of provenance  

Hi Tracy

I agree with much of what has been said. However, here are a few of my thoughts:

- As an artist, I have to say I like the "artiness" in many old labels.
- Most collectors will only pay what they think is the right price regardless, although there are some that will pay a premium for bragging rights.
- I bought a specimen from Jordi in Tucson last year. It has a few things going for it. Firstly it is a very nice campylite from Dry Gill. I have a fondness for Cumbrian minerals. Secondly it has a Harrod's label. I had no idea that the famous Harrod's store ever sold minerals. So I learnt something, and found this amusing. Thirdly the price I paid was right for me for the specimen.
- I have three Russell specimens, and in all three instances, the labels are much more aesthetic than the minerals!
- A while back, I received a batch of New Zealand micros from a friend in the US. He had originally received them from Jocelyn Thornton in the 1980s. Jocelyn, also a good friend, remembers sending them.

_________________
Regards

Steve
Mineral Collector and Artist
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   
Display posts from previous:   
   Index -> The Ten Thousand Club   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 2
  Goto page 1, 2  Next  

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


All pictures, text, design © Forum FMF 2006-2024


Powered by FMF