We use cookies to show content based on your preferences. If you continue to browse you accept their use and installation. More information. >

FMF - Friends of Minerals Forum, discussion and message board
The place to share your mineralogical experiences


Spanish message board






Newest topics and users posts
27 Mar-19:47:08 Re: 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Pete Richards)
27 Mar-16:15:44 Re: 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Cfrench58)
27 Mar-15:18:59 Re: 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Alfredo)
27 Mar-14:39:29 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Cfrench58)
27 Mar-05:21:48 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Mim Museum)
27 Mar-05:03:26 Re: trying to find information on rose/pink quartz and tourmaline associations. (Ning)
27 Mar-02:39:50 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Tobi)
27 Mar-00:23:28 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
26 Mar-00:53:41 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
25 Mar-13:32:10 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
25 Mar-00:25:58 The mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
23 Mar-13:35:22 Re: collection of firmo espinar (Firmo Espinar)
22 Mar-08:32:28 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
22 Mar-04:20:41 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Mim Museum)
21 Mar-22:49:19 Re: green seam. Looks like it in a state of decay. (Ning)
21 Mar-22:47:40 Re: green seam. Looks like it in a state of decay. (Ning)
21 Mar-22:45:25 Re: green seam. Looks like it in a state of decay. (Ning)
21 Mar-15:34:23 Re: the mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
21 Mar-14:35:08 Re: jim’s mineral collection (Jim Wilkinson)
21 Mar-14:15:36 The 4th phoenix heritage mineral show (phms) hosted by mineralogical society of arizona (m (Chris Whitney-smith)
21 Mar-04:36:10 Re: the mizunaka collection (Tobi)
21 Mar-04:11:47 Re: jim’s mineral collection (James Catmur)
20 Mar-23:34:15 The mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
20 Mar-18:13:16 Re: jim’s mineral collection (Jim Wilkinson)
20 Mar-14:06:43 Re: dry gill mine, caldbeck fells, cumbria, uk (Forrestblyth)

For lists of newest topics and postings click here


RSS RSS

View unanswered posts

Why and how to register

Index Index
 FAQFAQ RegisterRegister  Log inLog in
 {Forgotten your password?}Forgotten your password?  

Like
111799


The time now is Mar 28, 2024 03:06

Search for a textSearch for a text   

A general guide for using the Forum with some rules and tips
The information provided within this Forum about localities is only given to allow reference to them. Any visit to any of the localities requires you to obtain full permission and relevant information prior to your visit. FMF is strictly against any illicit activities related to collecting minerals.
A terrible nuisance
  
  Index -> Conserving, Preparing and Cleaning Minerals
Like
4


View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

John S. White
Site Admin



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1295
Location: Stewartstown, Pennsylvania, USA


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 04, 2017 04:37    Post subject: A terrible nuisance  

Back from Munich and processing my dozen or so mineral acquisitions. About one third of them have the locality information or price stuck on with very soft Tack (not sure of spelling) and it is a horror. It is very difficult to completely remove from the sample, it gets all over your fingers and it sticks to everything it comes in contact with. It is almost so annoying that I would consider not buying a specimen if the dealer used it. I spent more time trying to clean it off and up than I did in numbering and labeling my new specimens.
_________________
John S. White
aka Rondinaire
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
3
   

Bob Harman




Joined: 06 Nov 2015
Posts: 765


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 04, 2017 06:23    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

Hi John,
I know exactly what you are talking about. For my small sub collection of smaller examples I have tried several solvents; while most worked to some extent, none was perfect. Acetone might be one to try, but I suspect you have already gone that route.

Your best option might be to again mount the specimen in such a way as to reuse the same tack (sp?). Then you need not attempt to remove it in the first place! BOB
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

lluis




Joined: 17 Nov 2006
Posts: 710

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 04, 2017 06:52    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

Hi,

Having suffered that, I found that using a new piece of BlueTack (that is the name of the brand I use.... I think is the original one.. more expensive than the others, but far better to my taste,,) and sticking it in the places where residues of the old tack is and pulling out in a move, you take some old tack. Doing it as many times as it is necessary and maybe using several pieces... I completely cleaned all the pieces I processed....
Yes, takes time and a lot of patience... But...

With best wishes

Lluís
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
1
   

Fiebre Verde




Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 942
Location: Paris Area


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 04, 2017 08:06    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

It is indeed a nuisance.
And when this is done on a crumbly sample, removing the 'tack' can quickly become a horror story as you sometimes feel the whole specimen is falling apart.
Gérard
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Charlotte




Joined: 17 Apr 2008
Posts: 17
Location: Charlotte, North carolina


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 04, 2017 08:47    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

Amen!

Not only a useless and fruitless labor but there is real risk of scratching a softish mineral in attempting to remove the blasted tac (sp?). A double curse on those who stick it to a crystal face! That's what matrix is for. Maybe the blue tack (sp?) is easier to use but any remaining is extremely visible. Even minimal remains seem to shine out of proportion to the size of the residual

Bill Logan

_________________
Bill logan
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

lluis




Joined: 17 Nov 2006
Posts: 710

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 04, 2017 10:00    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

Hi, Bill

Indeed to adhere it to a crystal face is a crime, provided that there is matrix.
But when it is only a double terminated crystal, may I humbly ask where you adhere it?
And do not say me thermosilicone (that is thermo, but not silicone, just a low melting polyvinyl acetate). I smashed two nice specimens, even when they were soaked (not only wet, really soaked!) in alcohol (ethanol, pharma grade to be exact).
I have in front of my eyes an Ouro Preto double terminated crystal, without matrix (not a cleaved one; all faces are the crystal original non cleaved ones) stuck with blue tack. I took apart and *no traces* of tack are in.... And it is more than two years in this state....
Only the cheaper ones work bad.
And I hate them...
I destroyed an already eaten label, old, on a piece of sylvanite, just fixed with the Tack in the label. I could remove all it, easily, But I could not recover what tack took from the very "ripe" paper.... (cellulose and sulphuric acid are not good friends... :-( )

Anyway, just tastes and ways to display and mount collections....

With best wishes

Lluís
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Pierre Joubert




Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Posts: 1605
Location: Western Cape


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 04, 2017 14:00    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

When the Tac is old, it has the evil habit of doing that. I find that turpentine works best to remove the old tac, using an old toothbrush or piece of cloth.
_________________
Pierre Joubert


'The tree of silence bears the fruit of peace. '
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

lluis




Joined: 17 Nov 2006
Posts: 710

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 04, 2017 16:06    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

Hi, Pierre

Depends on tack...
The Blue Tack does not do this.. It maintains as first day....
And I do not believe that in Catalonia we have a better in world....I just know the grey ones used to be from bad to very bad... And yes, those each day are a little worse....

With best wishes

Lluís

P.D.: turpentine may work in some.. In others, I doubt it makes something.... Maybe with dimethylsulphoxide.... But if you are not chemist, hard to find... And besides, has dermal absorption and brings a garlic taste to skin (apart of aroma, that is not exactly Chanel 5...)
Still, a piece of blue tack and patience is the best I have found....
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

John S. White
Site Admin



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1295
Location: Stewartstown, Pennsylvania, USA


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 05, 2017 04:05    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

Just to be clear I was referring to the grey tack not the blue tack, but the blue tack can be a little bit of a problem also.
_________________
John S. White
aka Rondinaire
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

lluis




Joined: 17 Nov 2006
Posts: 710

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 05, 2017 10:57    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

Grey tack is in two variants... (at least to my knowledge): one is bad. The other is even worse....
With Blue Tack technique I has been able to clean the worse grey Tack...
And indeed it is a terrible nuisance....

With best wishes
Lluís
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

James Catmur
Site Admin



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 1340
Location: Cambridge


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 05, 2017 12:35    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

The white stuff is really awful, and some blue stuff it bad too (spent a while yesterday trying to clean one specimen where the blue stuff had gone very tacky)
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

lluis




Joined: 17 Nov 2006
Posts: 710

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 05, 2017 13:34    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

Hi, James

The blue one I use is Blue Tack brand.
It works well, and withstand in time (in a land that is not exactly cold, and very humid, where things tend to deteriorate very quickly....)
I bought one time a white one that is also good. Was same price as the blue one
The grey ones were in pieces I bought, and are awful.

But I suppose that bad brands could be in any colour.... It is just a question to use a pigment or another,... And done shade tacks have, by sure is the less in total cost.....

With best wishes

Lluís
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 4888
Location: Barcelona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 05, 2017 17:46    Post subject: Re: A nuisance  

I never tried it but it could work. Please read carefully the comments below the video in You Tube and note that some oil could remain in the specimen.

If some one try it it could be nice read here their thoughts.

Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Peter Lemkin




Joined: 18 Nov 2016
Posts: 398
Location: Prague

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 06, 2017 00:33    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

I'm sure WD-40 will remove blue tack and a lot of other things from a wall, but I'd not want to use it on specimens. It contains a lot of strong solvents and chemical cleaners - none of which are publicly listed [proprietary secrets]. Strong, dense, minerals without fissures or channels might be OK if cleaned afterwards, but so many others would absorb or adsorb some of the solvents and who knows what would happen after some time.

I find a lot of mineral dealers are now using hot glue to mount specimens for sale. So far I've had no trouble removing the specimens from the glue, which is not to my liking [although not totally offensive]; however, on a fragile specimen I could see it might cause it to break trying to remove it or be incorporated into fibrous or friable materials. I hear that soaking in warm water or use of isopropol [rubbing] alcohol weakens the hot glue's grip on the specimens.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 4888
Location: Barcelona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 06, 2017 03:29    Post subject: Re: A nuisance  

Please check: Hot Glue Gun Mounting and Willard Perkins Classic "Perky" Mount
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

James Catmur
Site Admin



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 1340
Location: Cambridge


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 06, 2017 03:39    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

Hola Lluis

I agree that the original Blu Tack works well, but the problem is that there are so many new versions around that are not great and leave a residue.

James

lluis wrote:
The blue one I use is Blue Tack brand.
It works well, and withstand in time (in a land that is not exactly cold, and very humid, where things tend to deteriorate very quickly....)
I bought one time a white one that is also good. Was same price as the blue one
The grey ones were in pieces I bought, and are awful.

But I suppose that bad brands could be in any colour.... It is just a question to use a pigment or another,... And done shade tacks have, by sure is the less in total cost.....
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

lluis




Joined: 17 Nov 2006
Posts: 710

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 06, 2017 08:18    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

Completely agreed with you James!

I have found all ones, and some are (well, were... Already cleaned completely with what I said... Solvents, well, could work, but if you are not chemist, to buy the one needed could be another nightmare (I suppose, "Nightmare II, the quest for the elusive solvent"...)
And that it works and is not too bad for health, well, .....

But I clean the grey putty stickier soft sh** without letting any residue.
And I crushed two Getchell Mine specimens (a realgar and an orpiment) attached with hot glue (simply matrix was too soft/brittle). Those the ones that hurt me more,,,, The rest, well, maybe more than two dozens....

with best wishes

Lluís
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Michael mc mullen




Joined: 04 Nov 2017
Posts: 3
Location: Scotland

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 10, 2017 01:47    Post subject: Re: A terrible nuisance  

Have you considered freezing it ? either place an ice-cube on it or put the specimen in the freezer for a short spell. This is what you do do remove chewing gum from things.The gum/tack just breaks/lifts off.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   
Display posts from previous:   
   Index -> Conserving, Preparing and Cleaning Minerals   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1
    

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


All pictures, text, design © Forum FMF 2006-2024


Powered by FMF