We use cookies to show content based on your preferences. If you continue to browse you accept their use and installation. More information. >

FMF - Friends of Minerals Forum, discussion and message board
The place to share your mineralogical experiences


Spanish message board






Newest topics and users posts
27 Mar-19:47:08 Re: 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Pete Richards)
27 Mar-16:15:44 Re: 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Cfrench58)
27 Mar-15:18:59 Re: 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Alfredo)
27 Mar-14:39:29 2 unknowns co-occurring with caledonite, grand reef mine, az (Cfrench58)
27 Mar-05:21:48 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Mim Museum)
27 Mar-05:03:26 Re: trying to find information on rose/pink quartz and tourmaline associations. (Ning)
27 Mar-02:39:50 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Tobi)
27 Mar-00:23:28 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
26 Mar-00:53:41 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
25 Mar-13:32:10 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
25 Mar-00:25:58 The mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
23 Mar-13:35:22 Re: collection of firmo espinar (Firmo Espinar)
22 Mar-08:32:28 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
22 Mar-04:20:41 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Mim Museum)
21 Mar-22:49:19 Re: green seam. Looks like it in a state of decay. (Ning)
21 Mar-22:47:40 Re: green seam. Looks like it in a state of decay. (Ning)
21 Mar-22:45:25 Re: green seam. Looks like it in a state of decay. (Ning)
21 Mar-15:34:23 Re: the mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
21 Mar-14:35:08 Re: jim’s mineral collection (Jim Wilkinson)
21 Mar-14:15:36 The 4th phoenix heritage mineral show (phms) hosted by mineralogical society of arizona (m (Chris Whitney-smith)
21 Mar-04:36:10 Re: the mizunaka collection (Tobi)
21 Mar-04:11:47 Re: jim’s mineral collection (James Catmur)
20 Mar-23:34:15 The mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
20 Mar-18:13:16 Re: jim’s mineral collection (Jim Wilkinson)
20 Mar-14:06:43 Re: dry gill mine, caldbeck fells, cumbria, uk (Forrestblyth)

For lists of newest topics and postings click here


RSS RSS

View unanswered posts

Why and how to register

Index Index
 FAQFAQ RegisterRegister  Log inLog in
 {Forgotten your password?}Forgotten your password?  

Like
111799


The time now is Mar 28, 2024 05:26

Search for a textSearch for a text   

A general guide for using the Forum with some rules and tips
The information provided within this Forum about localities is only given to allow reference to them. Any visit to any of the localities requires you to obtain full permission and relevant information prior to your visit. FMF is strictly against any illicit activities related to collecting minerals.
Natural History Museum London
  Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
  Index -> Natural History Museum London
Like
9


View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

nurbo




Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Posts: 457
Location: Lancashire


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 05:51    Post subject: Natural History Museum London  

I was in London for a while so I thought Id venture to the mineral room at the natural history museum in South Kensington. Ill get my complaints out of the way first..

Firstly ... the politically correct and the busy body lawyers have been in there and all the radioactives have been removed for "Safety reasons", this is ridiculous, they have many fragile specimens that would be susceptible to damage sealed in glass containers so why not the radioactives if theyre that paranoid about them

Secondly ... I found the lighting in certain areas to be appaling, yellow light bulbs which afffect the colour of some of the pieces, some of the pieces are in the shadows thown by the pillars that hold the roof up and are extremely hard to see in any detail escpecially if your eyes are as rubbish as mine.

Thridly ... some of the more fragile pieces are literally falling to bits due to not being kept in the righ conditions

Fourthly ... some items are mislabelled.

Then theres the Gift shop which sells baked Amethyst as "Citrine" alongside dyed agate and tumble stones.



DSC00245.JPG
 Description:
All the radioactives have these labels where the specimens should be.
 Viewed:  54425 Time(s)

DSC00245.JPG



DSC00239.JPG
 Description:
Note the difference between the light through the window and the yellow light in the cabinet.
 Viewed:  54436 Time(s)

DSC00239.JPG



DSC00299.JPG
 Description:
Decomposing Searlsite specimen, what a shame.
 Viewed:  54500 Time(s)

DSC00299.JPG



DSC00315.JPG
 Description:
Pyromorphite, Broken Hill ZAMBIA?????
 Viewed:  54444 Time(s)

DSC00315.JPG



DSC00242.JPG
 Description:
Benitoite with BLACK Natrolite?????
 Viewed:  54470 Time(s)

DSC00242.JPG



DSC00264.JPG
 Description:
Baked Amethyst sold as Citrine in the gift shop.
 Viewed:  54431 Time(s)

DSC00264.JPG


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

nurbo




Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Posts: 457
Location: Lancashire


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 06:09    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

The good thing though is it is huge and has an absolutely amazing collection. I took about 130 photos and didnt even scratch the surface. It really is mind boggling how great the collection they have is, from slabs of Granite to a huge number of minerals Id not previously heard of to Calictes and Quartz. They have a fine collection of UK minerals from all over the country. Amazing and totally worth a vist, though I reckon it is overwhelming so its best to go a few times so you dont get any sensory overload, I'll post more later.


DSC00237.JPG
 Description:
The Hall of rocks.
 Viewed:  54456 Time(s)

DSC00237.JPG



DSC00249.JPG
 Description:
Jap Law Quartz from Brazil, around 20 - 25 cms tall
 Viewed:  54412 Time(s)

DSC00249.JPG



DSC00252.JPG
 Description:
Huge Beryl crystal about 75 cms tall I think it is from Mexico.
 Viewed:  54445 Time(s)

DSC00252.JPG



DSC00257.JPG
 Description:
Crandallitte from Cornwall about 75 - 80 cms across
 Viewed:  54417 Time(s)

DSC00257.JPG



DSC00259.JPG
 Description:
Incredible 75 + cm Witherite, from the Fallowfield Mine
 Viewed:  54452 Time(s)

DSC00259.JPG



DSC00276.JPG
 Description:
Huge Kidney Ore about 75+ cms across from Lindal Moor
 Viewed:  54414 Time(s)

DSC00276.JPG



DSC00246.JPG
 Description:
Beautifully formed Andreasberg Calcite, about 75+ cms across.
 Viewed:  54430 Time(s)

DSC00246.JPG



DSC00258.JPG
 Description:
Scottish Galena on Quartz around 30 cm across.
 Viewed:  54443 Time(s)

DSC00258.JPG



DSC00240.JPG
 Description:
Huge Cerussite from Cornwall, around 75+ cms.
 Viewed:  54409 Time(s)

DSC00240.JPG


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 4888
Location: Barcelona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 06:13    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

nurbo wrote:

Pyromorphite, Broken Hill ZAMBIA?????


Yes, is a mine named Broken Hill also in Zambia and with green Pyromorphites! ;-) -> https://www.mindat.org/loc-4341.html
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

arturo shaw




Joined: 23 Oct 2009
Posts: 89


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 06:22    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

Hi,

First I think that we have to separate the museum and minerals display from the shops which are private business and have nothing to do with the minerals collection.

Did you pay to visit the collection? Every museum in the world has problems dealing with the little amount of many they have to keep their collection. I would like to have more money to deal with mine too. No Museum at all will object if you insist to make a contribution in cash, many even have boxes ready for the case being. :-)

I think we could wait for Alan or Mike to tell us about those problems you are mentioning and the reasons behind.

And I will be there after tomorrow and take a direct look at the situation. :-)

Cheers

Arturo Shaw

PS: Was the exhibition on sex already open? (Doesn't sound right "exhibition on sex" I find) :-)

Cheers

Arturo Shaw
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 4888
Location: Barcelona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 06:46    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

I believe it deserves the read of what Alan Hart, curator of London Natural History Museum, wrote -> https://www.mineral-forum.com/message-board/viewtopic.php?p=3073#3073 (and following) as well as the whole thread "Museums policy", impulsed by Gail and that I consider one of the best threads of FMF -> https://www.mineral-forum.com/message-board/viewtopic.php?t=442
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

crocoite




Joined: 06 Feb 2009
Posts: 487
Location: Ballarat, Victoria


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 07:22    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

Nothing wrong with Broken Hill, Zambia...

Regards
Steve
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Peter




Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 346
Location: Sweden / Luxembourg

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 08:39    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

The large beryl I think is from the Moss area, Östfold (east side of the Oslo fjord), Norway.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Les Presmyk




Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 372
Location: Gilbert, AZ

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 08:43    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

Broken Hill, Rhodesia produced world-class pyromorphite, smithsonite, hopeite and parahopeite, among others. I was not sure if the total locality was being questioned or just Zambia versus Rhodesia.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Alan.Hart




Joined: 05 Jan 2009
Posts: 15
Location: London

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 08:55    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

Well first off thanks for posting a message about our collections, whether good news or bad - people have opinions and it also gives us a chance to not only try and put things in perspective but also reveal our plans and hope to set things straight - and of course learn what people want to see.

First off, arturo is right in the fact that the shops are very much separate from the minerals collection, although we would like to build a closer relationship with content - I will certainly bring this to the attention of our 'shops' people to ensure we put in some disclosure here.

Yes, all 'radioactive' specimens have been removed from display apart from a few that are in specially designed lead-lined and mirror viewed cases. The reason being that we had to follow health and safety legislation and obey legal limits of exposure compliance. The only reason we have kept the labels in the case was to try and maintain some semblance of 'systematics' although as I shall come to later this will be reviewed.

We are quite aware of some of the decayed specimens which are being removed (albeit slowly), and the variance in lighting (although I must say your image does make it look much worse considering your other images of large specimens are in identical cases). Fluorescent lighting is the worse type for any display, daylight of course being best for which the space itself is very good for within the systematic collection (apart from the darker early evenings). I had to smile at the 'black natrolite', a more recent label that seems to have been somewhat swopped around during proof reading - to be fixed.

With such a large collection and collections 'space' there will always be some problems. However, this doesn't mean that they should be overlooked, so in terms of the future we are looking at major plans for the development of the collection and displays. I'm glad you figured some positive aspects and specimens from the collection. It is true to say that every-time I come into the Museum and walk through the collection areas I am simply amazed by it. Indeed, I believe it is still one of the largest and most comprehensive (if not the!) in terms of its depth of coverage, although of course in more recent years it has been lacking in resources to develop as we would like - however I see a change here.

For some background information - for some years we had been close to losing the gallery. With what looked like a global decline in systematic mineralogy through loss of systematic displays to themes, or the what I like to call the rise of 'short-term-ism' where the realisation of the monetary value of specimens leads to what can only be described as selling off the 'family silver' to raise funds which may not be directly related to developing a the collection from which they came - things looked pretty grim. However, at the NHM the collection is not only about the display itself, but also about how it may faciliate active research into various aspects of the mineral Sciences. It is through cleverly linking these perceived different aspects of collections that we can plan a way forward to develop both.

As curator, who is fortunate to have an excellent (and small) team to work with, we have a vision to set in motion that will certainly take time - but our plans are coming together. I hoped you managed to see the Vault space which was our first goal, to show off some of the best parts of our collection with good narrative information that both enlightens our visitors and sets a standard of display. This exhibition has been a huge success, visitors coming to Museum who may never had considered the beauty of a well crystallised specimen, have been 'enlightened' and no doubt wondered at how some of the magnificent specimens have 'formed'. From this exhibition, we have a direct link pointing at the systematic collection as 'natures mineralogical diversity', and through this we have a plan of collections development that is not only in place to facilitate the aim of having this diversity represented, but as to how it may be used (or is used) as a research resource. This has lead to our second goal in that the collection is not perceived as a 'dreary display of extended Victoriana', but a dynamic collection that meets the needs of research linked with a diverse specimen display, including the many unique specimens that reflect this.

Our next goal is to develop the gallery display itself. As I mentioned, we do acknowledge that the gallery needs upgrading, including some new lighting since it has hardly changed since 1880, but we do need to fit this in with other Museum priorities ahead of it. One of the major issues is of course 'funding', which would be quite significant to put in place the changes we anticipate. However, I do see that over the next few years this will happen - we like to think we have developed good relationships to those who may consider realising our goals. For me personally the goal will be keeping the impressiveness and historical aspects of the space, but adding modern lighting and a mechanisms for keeping the displays revised and up-to-date, and to ensure the collection itself is both continued to be added to through a dynamic acquisitions programme. This is already happening in terms of how Mike and I are now funded to attend the Tucson and Munich shows with a much better 'budget' being in place year on year - but we still have a way to go. Its here also I must thank those people who loan and donate to us specimens and funds, which has been rather better lately - I hope a reflection that that we are seen as a place that is still 'doing Mineralogy' including developing the collections and championing our hobby and science.

I have seemingly digressed a little. Yes we have problems as all large public collections do, but I hope you can see how far we have come and how far we want to go.

Also, we usually like to have some warning, but if you go to the visitors desk and we are here, we are usually always willing to say hi and 'talk minerals'

Arturio, 'Sexual Nature' is our new temporary exhibition, it is open and I must say I found it actually very good indeed having not much idea what to expect!

Best

Alan

Mineralogy Head of Collections, NHM
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 4888
Location: Barcelona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 09:10    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

As FMFers can see, Alan is extremely affordable and friendly, and this is a treasure considering the fabulous patrimony he manages.

As I also said to other people with some critics to the current state of the NHM, please give Alan the oportunity to expand his projects and please try to be generous with him and the NHM. I believe the future of NHM is much better than his current state, just give Alan, Mike and the rest of the team, chances to do his best.

BTW, Alan, you would like to know that we also discussed in the Spanish side about the NHM, and the comments there were almost enthusiatic. Everybody in Spain loves NHM! -> https://www.foro-minerales.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2027 (with a lot of photos to enjoy!)
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

katherine.Dunnell




Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Posts: 13
Location: Toronto

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 09:45    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

I think Alan hit on a couple of key issues in his post, and ones that are not stressed enough. We all are working against a strong swing of the life sciences at the moment, where bugs, Darwinism and environmental geology are deemed to be more "sexy" than traditional mineralogy.
Funding to a "stale" science is hard, made that much harder given that rocks and minerals are not a core science in elementary and high schools.
Funding and more importantly, resources within the museum are ever stretched. At the ROM, we have ample endowments for getting lights upgraded, labels, rotating cases, but to find bodies and preparators to do the work is a challenge, as their time is scheduled for major exhibitions and developing galleries.
It is like building a house, in that everyone is focused on 'getting it done', but trying to get a contractor back in to clean up deficiencies is terribly hard. We work in the context of a larger institution with dwindling resources, so it is incredibly challenging to get work done as the motto in a lot of museums is "if it isn't broken..."
I know Alan and I have spoken about his wish list for the museum, and they are actively trying to upgrade stores and display spaces within his discipline. There are exciting times ahead at the NHM, London.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jesse Fisher




Joined: 18 Mar 2009
Posts: 628
Location: San Francisco


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 11:43    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

In Nurbo's post, no mention was made of the adjoining Geological Museum and what has happened to it in recent years. If anyone remembers the old museum, which is now the eastern entrance to the NHM on Exhibition Road, it had excellent displays of both British and world-wide minerals with an emphasis on gemstone minerals, along with much on British geology. During the early 1990s this space was completely made-over, to the cost of many millions of Pounds. What we have now are some very "artistic" spaces with statues of famous figures from scientific history, a few minerals in lighted window-boxes, and a long escalator that ascends through a stylized globe that once rotated. In a side room there is a mineral display, which, while it houses some very fine British specimens, is so poorly lit and arranged that it offers absolutely no education on mineralogy or the history of British science to the visitor. Perhaps Alan can confirm (or deny) this, but I was told that at the time this remodel was done there were plans to remove the old systematic display, and that the only reason it survives today is that there was not the money available to dismantle it.

What this points up, I think, are some of the changes (and conflicts) that have arisen in how both the visiting public and the management of many natural history and science museums view their role in society. There has been much hash made about the dumbing-down of society in recent years, and judging from what I hear from a few friends who teach in public schools (here in the US), it sounds like science education has largely fallen off the curriculum in many places. If the visiting public is no longer interested in static displays about science, how do science museums retain their relevance? Many seem to be choosing to become what I call "Natural History Theme Parks" that specialize in entertainment rather than education.

A very good example if this trend is the San Francisco Academy of Sciences. Before the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake damaged the old structure, it housed many "traditional" style exhibits, including an extensive set of dioramas depicting native American Indian cultures along the Pacific Coast, as well as a modest mineral display. All this is now gone, and a new building has been constructed that is "environmentally compatible." This means that there is absolutely no climate control for the exhibits, which I guess doesn't matter as all the old ones are now gone. What we have now are an aquarium and tidepool exhibit where kids can handle the starfish, a simulated tropical rainforest, which due to health and safety concerns contains no poisonous plants or insects, no Howler Monkeys in the tree-tops, and not a drop of precipitation to cause the casual visitor any discomfort. There are three gift-shops all selling the same t-shirts, logo coffee mugs, jewelry and a few coffee-table picture books. Not a single scientific textbook or journal was to be seen. On the day I visited the place was packed, despite the rather high entry fee of $25 per head. Ironically, the most popular exhibit seemed to be the food concession, where-by visitors left behind even more money.

Modern science museums are facing a dilemma in that entertainment is more popular with the public than education. Natural history, which was once in vogue (particularly in Victorian England) is now quite out of fashion. To justify themselves and their hard-fought budgets, many museums are becoming institutes of public entertainment rather than learning and research. This obviously gets more of the public through the doors than static old science displays. Fortunately for those of us interested in mineralogy and geology, we still have the systematic hall at the NHM. It sorely needs modernization in some respects (though I must admit that I absolutely love the old Victorian display cabinets). Alan and Mike have a monumental task in front of them to engineer this, while preserving the educational and historical aspects of the display. They deserve the support of anyone who truly cares about minerals and the history of science.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

nurbo




Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Posts: 457
Location: Lancashire


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 22, 2011 12:27    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

Hi again,
EEK! I didnt expect such a thorough, swift and enlightening response from the people "On the spot" as it were, this is a testemant to what a superb resource this forum is for everyone from your small amateur collector (Like me) to the far more significant individuals in the mineral world.
Really in my initial post I intended to have a little moan about a couple of what are really minor issues in the face of such a huge and amazing collection as is found at the NHM, then post some of the better photos from the 130 or so I took while I was there.

I was absolutely blown away by the mineral room, I visited 3 times because it is impossible to take it in in one visit, in fact its impossible to take it in in 3 visits. The endless cases of superb specimen after superb specimen is breathtaking. The museum is free, obviously you can donate via donation boxes and Id like to think that those of us who visit will give to the extent our finances allow.

It is remiss of me to have not checked the Broken Hill locality in Zambia before stating this was an error but those of you who have read my previous posts will no doubt realise sometimes I say things before Ive really thought them through. I was wrong and I stand corrected, however if I hadnt seen the "Black Natrolite" label I would have been far more likely to have assumed there was a Broken Hill in Zambia. Im not seeking to justify my incorrect statement merely trying to make the point that if you see one thing wrongly labelled it sets a mental precedant whereby one might assume that other things are also mislabelled, I also appreciate that typos happen and I have every faith that the immense majority of specimens in the collection are correctly labelled.

Regarding the gift shop I also appreciate this is a business and seperate from the mineral department but selling baked Amethyst as Citrine is a pet irritation for myself as well as many others.

The photograph which shows the yellow lighting is simply how my phone took it, Im never sure about mobile phone photography, but thats how it looked next to the natural light that was coming through the window.

All in all though its an amazing collection, an amazing museum and clearly the staff are working hard to improve things which is very heartening.

More photos ....All measurements are very much approximations from memory.



box.JPG
 Description:
The finest Siderite "Box" you will ever be lucky enough to see. I seem to remember it being around 15 cms across sorry the photo isnt too great.
 Viewed:  54072 Time(s)

box.JPG



DSC00333.JPG
 Description:
Incredible Baryte, about 75 cms tall,
 Viewed:  54139 Time(s)

DSC00333.JPG



DSC00260.JPG
 Description:
Monster Galena specimen, see human for scale
 Viewed:  54086 Time(s)

DSC00260.JPG



DSC00295.JPG
 Description:
a cabinet of Microclines
 Viewed:  54119 Time(s)

DSC00295.JPG



DSC00343.JPG
 Description:
Adularia about 30 cms tall
 Viewed:  54078 Time(s)

DSC00343.JPG



DSC00250.JPG
 Description:
Quartz stands about 25-30 cms
 Viewed:  54047 Time(s)

DSC00250.JPG



DSC00270.JPG
 Description:
Fluorite about 25 cms tall
 Viewed:  54058 Time(s)

DSC00270.JPG



DSC00272.JPG
 Description:
Approx 15cms
 Viewed:  54119 Time(s)

DSC00272.JPG



DSC00273.JPG
 Description:
enormous Japanese Stibnite, probably about a metre across
 Viewed:  54038 Time(s)

DSC00273.JPG



DSC00282.JPG
 Description:
a pair of stunning Cornish Calcites around 15 - 20 cms tall
 Viewed:  54031 Time(s)

DSC00282.JPG



DSC00283.JPG
 Description:
Calcite maybe 30cms in diameter
 Viewed:  54046 Time(s)

DSC00283.JPG


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

nurbo




Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Posts: 457
Location: Lancashire


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 24, 2011 01:00    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

More pictures, so many of the pieces are enormous.


DSC00285.JPG
 Description:
Stunning Phosgenites
 Viewed:  53953 Time(s)

DSC00285.JPG



DSC00294.JPG
 Description:
Zinnwaldite's
 Viewed:  53938 Time(s)

DSC00294.JPG



DSC00357.JPG
 Description:
huge Garnets in matrix about a metre across,
 Viewed:  53969 Time(s)

DSC00357.JPG



DSC00368.JPG
 Description:
Blue Fluorite from Ullcoats , wow!
 Viewed:  53896 Time(s)

DSC00368.JPG



DSC00371.JPG
 Description:
Alston Barytocalcite
 Viewed:  53923 Time(s)

DSC00371.JPG



DSC00366.JPG
 Description:
another English Fluorite this one from Weardale
 Viewed:  53909 Time(s)

DSC00366.JPG



DSC00346.JPG
 Description:
Idocrase,.
 Viewed:  53899 Time(s)

DSC00346.JPG



DSC00316.JPG
 Description:
Ojuela material is quite well represented too,
 Viewed:  53941 Time(s)

DSC00316.JPG



DSC00279.JPG
 Description:
Cave-in-rock Fluorite and another Cornish one, huge specimens.
 Viewed:  53910 Time(s)

DSC00279.JPG



DSC00339.JPG
 Description:
big Brazillianite
 Viewed:  53924 Time(s)

DSC00339.JPG


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jesse Fisher




Joined: 18 Mar 2009
Posts: 628
Location: San Francisco


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 24, 2011 10:40    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

A few photos, taken summer 2010, from the area that was once the Geological Museum.


IMG_4602r.jpg
 Description:
Helidor beryl on feldspar from the Ural Mts., Russia.
 Viewed:  53835 Time(s)

IMG_4602r.jpg



IMG_4603r.jpg
 Description:
Fluorite on quartz with chalcopyrite from Cornwall (Caradon mines, I think). One of my personal favorites in the museum!
 Viewed:  53865 Time(s)

IMG_4603r.jpg



IMG_4615r.jpg
 Description:
Fluorite from Rotherhope Fell Mine, Alston Moor, Cumbria.
 Viewed:  53863 Time(s)

IMG_4615r.jpg



IMG_4616r.jpg
 Description:
Baryte from the West Cumbrian Iron Ore Fields around Frizington.
 Viewed:  53827 Time(s)

IMG_4616r.jpg



IMG_4593r.jpg
 Description:
A photo of the gallery that once housed the mineral display for the Geological Museum.
 Viewed:  53843 Time(s)

IMG_4593r.jpg


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Maxilos




Joined: 02 Nov 2010
Posts: 191
Location: Boskoop, The Netherlands


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 24, 2011 13:17    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

Hi,

I'm going to London with my school. We're with 13 persons and we were alowed to choose where we wanted to go. I of course said National Historical/Geological Museum London. It looks promising. The minerals look great, the Japanese Stibnite in particular.

I hope you've got more of those nice pictures!

Kind regards

Mark

_________________
"Still looking for the philosopher's stone" => Dutch proverb
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

nurbo




Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Posts: 457
Location: Lancashire


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2011 01:20    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

Hi again,
More pics. Maxilos if you can go do, but avoid weekends if you can, the lines of people waiting to enter are very long at the weekends and it can take an hour or so to get in to the museum.



DSC00243.JPG
 Description:
25+cm Benitoite specimen, I couldnt figure if the Natrolite needed further alkalising or if its just an odd colour.
 Viewed:  53748 Time(s)

DSC00243.JPG



DSC00244.JPG
 Description:
Huge Diopside specimen, I think it was about 35 cms tall
 Viewed:  53741 Time(s)

DSC00244.JPG



DSC00284.JPG
 Description:
30 cm Emerald
 Viewed:  53732 Time(s)

DSC00284.JPG



DSC00274.JPG
 Description:
15 cm Quartz
 Viewed:  53766 Time(s)

DSC00274.JPG



DSC00289.JPG
 Description:
Lovely Uvarovites
 Viewed:  53822 Time(s)

DSC00289.JPG



DSC00302.JPG
 Description:
Rubellites on matrix, this piece is about a metre across.
 Viewed:  53721 Time(s)

DSC00302.JPG



DSC00292.JPG
 Description:
Babingtonites, the best Ive ever seen.
 Viewed:  53716 Time(s)

DSC00292.JPG



DSC00261.JPG
 Description:
this is the first thing you see on ebtering the hall, the Blue Fluorite is about 35 + cms across.
 Viewed:  53719 Time(s)

DSC00261.JPG



DSC00291.JPG
 Description:
Top quality Dioptase
 Viewed:  53720 Time(s)

DSC00291.JPG



DSC00296.JPG
 Description:
The specimens are well spaced out in the cabinets for maximum viewing enjoyment.
 Viewed:  53735 Time(s)

DSC00296.JPG


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jesse Fisher




Joined: 18 Mar 2009
Posts: 628
Location: San Francisco


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2011 10:02    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

Just a quick tip to anyone trying to photograph minerals that are behind glass - if your camera is set on autofocus, it will almost invariably focus on the glass and rarely on the objects behind it. For best results, use a camera that can be switched to a manual focus mode. Also, if you are using a flash, try to shoot at an oblique angle to the glass to avoid getting reflections of the flash in the image.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Darren




Joined: 09 Aug 2009
Posts: 91
Location: New Mexico


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 26, 2011 00:03    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

Gotta love those Barytes!!! And the fluorite on quartz - wow! Thanks, Jesse!!! I remember reading a review of the museum a few years ago that was not very nice! Kind of cool to see it, thanks.

Darren
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

nurbo




Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Posts: 457
Location: Lancashire


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Feb 26, 2011 02:58    Post subject: Re: Natural History Museum London  

hi
I took these on my old mobile, so manual focus is out of the question, Id like to think they are adequate to whet the appetite of potential visitors though. I did discover that you get slightly better photos if you press the phone camera lense onto the glass rather than taking them from a distance. Next time I go Ill take my proper camera.
I emailed the gift shop to complain about the whole burnt Amethyst thing and they have now sent me 2 emails, apologising and saying they will look into it and keep me informed. This I find very impressive, they got in touch pretty much straight away and I believe they will do something about it. I think it devalues their biggest potential selling point for minerals, that being an NHM label, I was looking for a specimen to buy at the museum, but the gift shop had nothing of any interest for me, They must have hundreds of pieces gathering dust that could be sold off to raise funds to improve the collection, Im surprised they dont have an online shop for deaccessioned pieces carrying the NHM label, I for one would buy stuff.
Some more pics .........



DSC00241.JPG
 Description:
15+cm Norwegian Phenakite
 Viewed:  53436 Time(s)

DSC00241.JPG



DSC00247.JPG
 Description:
slightly blurry but what a Fluorite !!!! from MExico about 10 - 15 cm across
 Viewed:  53433 Time(s)

DSC00247.JPG



DSC00263.JPG
 Description:
Slightly off topic but this is a Dodo bird skeleton, an actual real Dodo bird!!! dates to 1860, amazing or what.
 Viewed:  53488 Time(s)

DSC00263.JPG



DSC00253.JPG
 Description:
metre long Cerussite specimen from Cornwall.
 Viewed:  53436 Time(s)

DSC00253.JPG



DSC00254.JPG
 Description:
this piece is about 30 cms, I seem to remember it being from Cornwall too, but I could be wrong.
 Viewed:  53456 Time(s)

DSC00254.JPG



DSC00255.JPG
 Description:
Dry Gill Mimetite, very well formed fat crystals in several colours, about 6+ cms Im a bit confused as to what "With wad" means though.
 Viewed:  53439 Time(s)

DSC00255.JPG



DSC00305.JPG
 Description:
big Apatite, probably 20 cms long
 Viewed:  53473 Time(s)

DSC00305.JPG



DSC00345.JPG
 Description:
Biotite about 25+ cms
 Viewed:  53490 Time(s)

DSC00345.JPG



DSC00293.JPG
 Description:
Huge Spodumenes, 30+ cms long
 Viewed:  53472 Time(s)

DSC00293.JPG


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   
Display posts from previous:   
   Index -> Natural History Museum London   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 4
  Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next  

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


All pictures, text, design © Forum FMF 2006-2024


Powered by FMF