View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jim Prentiss
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 103
Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Jan 09, 2011 22:28 Post subject: Fluorphosphohedyphane |
|
|
Hello Everyone,
I have recent acquired a Fluorphosphohedyphane specimen and I have found very little about it on the internet. Is there another source of information out there somewhere? I lack nost of the basic information such as hardness, streak, luster, etc. The new dana number would also be helpful, as that is how I catalogue my specimens. The Dana number on mindat is the number for Vanadinite.
Thank you,
Jim Prentiss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pete Richards
Site Admin
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 828
Location: Northeast Ohio
|
Posted: Jan 10, 2011 09:24 Post subject: Re: Fluorphosphohedyphane |
|
|
An interesting challenge! I was not able to find much... Nothing on webmineral.com, nothing at the Handbook of Mineralogy site at Mineral Society of America. Pierre Perroud's Athena site lists fluorphosphohedyphane (with OH in the formula rather than F, which must be an error) and gives the IMA number but no classification info or other data. There's a recent paper revising the nomenclature of the apatite group which lists fluorphosphohedyphane as the preferred name for the former phosphohedyphane-(F): Eur. J. Mineral. 2010, 22, 163–179 (do a web search for fluorphosphohedyphane and you'll find the URL for it).
I found this citation via web search: Kampf, A.R. & Housley, R.M. (2010): Fluorphosphohedyphane, Ca2Pb3(PO4)3F, the first apatite supergroup mineral with essential Pb and F. American Mineralogist, 95, (in press). However, a search at the American Mineralogist web site does not uncover this paper; apparently it is still in press.
I would guess that, since the mineral was only approved by IMA in 2008 and its name is technically not published yet, the various web databases have not captured it yet, by either the new or the old name. Interestingly enough, the first published mention of the old name appears to be the article which revised it to its new name! _________________ Collecting and studying crystals with interesting habits, twinning, and epitaxy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lluis
Joined: 17 Nov 2006
Posts: 711
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pete Richards
Site Admin
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 828
Location: Northeast Ohio
|
Posted: Jan 10, 2011 10:59 Post subject: Re: Fluorphosphohedyphane |
|
|
Yes, but as Jim pointed out, the Dana number given there is wrong. Since Mindat lists Dana numbers according to Dana's System 8th edition (copyright 1997) and the mineral was not published until 2008-2010 (depending on what you take to be the official publication), I don't know how Mindat will be able to assign a Dana number.... The Strunz numbers do not identify species, only groups.
Given the images on Mindat, its color is white, and presumably its streak is white. But with these very small delicate crystals, determining hardness and luster and even specific gravity (empirically) may not be possible. _________________ Collecting and studying crystals with interesting habits, twinning, and epitaxy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum
Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 4899
Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Jan 10, 2011 14:27 Post subject: Re: Fluorphosphohedyphane |
|
|
lluis wrote: |
Hi Pete,
Thanks for pointing the fact that Dana 8th edition is prior the acceptance of the mineral. But to give a number is feasible using same system as Dana used.
People from Lapis used to attribute the number according to the Strunz system, and now is the Lapis system.
A think I have seen is that the Nickel Strunz system uses same number for all the group
https://www.mineralatlas.eu/lexikon/index.php//Mineralklasse?strunz9=8.BN
Then, maybe the wrong Dana number come from a database that when saw the number in Nickel Strunz attributed the same Dana...
I found some articles on the mineral, but no physical data.
The last entry I have seen is from June 2010, so, maybe as is said in others, when printed in American Mineralogist all data would be available.
With best wishes
Lluís
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GneissWare
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 1287
Location: California
|
Posted: Feb 20, 2011 13:02 Post subject: Re: Fluorphosphohedyphane |
|
|
I just attended a presentation by Dr. Robert Housley who is very involved with finding new species at the Blue Bell claims, San Bernardino Co., California. Although IMA has accepted this as a new species, the documentation is still in press, which might explain the lack of information at this time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jim Prentiss
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 103
Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Feb 20, 2011 16:55 Post subject: Re: Fluorphosphohedyphane |
|
|
Thank you Everyone,
I was taken aback when this popped up on my email today. I had put that on the back burner and forgot about it.
I will keep an eye out for future information.
Thanks again,
jimp |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|