View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mark Ost

Joined: 18 Mar 2013
Posts: 516
Location: Virginia Beach



|
Posted: Apr 09, 2013 16:21 Post subject: Re: Waterclear mineral from Nepal? |
|
|
here is a non destructive idea that is not indicative but might give you a leg up. Try putting under a UV SW lamp (if you could find a three way lamp all the better. Feldspar can fluoresce dim red, especially if cold, then they often fluoresce brighter. I would doubt, if it were quartz, it would do anything (though I do have a La Sassa quartz that sure does fluoresce nicely!). Might try that. Won't hurt the crystal.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Josele

Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 410
Location: Tarifa, Spain



|
Posted: Apr 09, 2013 18:14 Post subject: Re: Waterclear mineral from Nepal? |
|
|
Pete Richards wrote: | ... If it is indeed quartz, there should be a set of six prism faces with parallel edges (well, part of the set might be missing), they should all have striations perpendicular to their parallel edges, and other faces should not be striated. If these could be identified, we could know the orientation of the crystal and perhaps understand the details of how it is distorted. I see striations on two faces, but cannot determine if they are all parallel or not. |
Pete, thanks for your help. Following your reasoning, please see following pictures.
Pete Modreski wrote: | ... Wondering about the test by the Japanese lab--does it say anywhere, what method they actually used to make this identification? Just by sight and morphology? XRD? XRF? Something else? Many tests a lab might do would require removing a fragment from the specimen--again, I'm sure they would be reluctant to try to do this. ... |
Pete, I can't understand Japanese but I think the test was just optical. In paper results, test type are in English, I can read only RI result because is in numbers: 1,54 - 1,55.
I will ask Eric if he can take video.
Mark Ost wrote: | here is a non destructive idea that is not indicative but might give you a leg up. Try putting under a UV SW lamp (if you could find a three way lamp all the better. Feldspar can fluoresce dim red, especially if cold, then they often fluoresce brighter. ... |
Mark, I think there is the fluorescence test result in the paper ...but in Japanese.
Very thanks for your inputs.
Description: |
Presumed albite/quartz Ganesh Himal, Dhading District, Bagmati Zone, Nepal crystal size: 8,1 x 4,3 x 1,3 cm Photo & collection: Eric Manandhar
I understand that the only position could exist a trigonal axis in this cristal should be in almost vertical position (in this photo), parallel to edges between presumed prism faces. But striation is also parallel... |
|
Viewed: |
31334 Time(s) |

|
Description: |
Presumed albite/quartz Ganesh Himal, Dhading District, Bagmati Zone, Nepal crystal size: 8,1 x 4,3 x 1,3 cm Photo & collection: Eric Manandhar
Weird striations for a quartz... |
|
Viewed: |
31347 Time(s) |

|
Description: |
If we assume that quartz striation in prism faces are always perpendicular to c axis, in this picture we have trigonal axis in vertical position. Where are now the presummed edges between prism faces parallel to c axis? |
|
Viewed: |
31353 Time(s) |

|
Description: |
Quartz Miram Shah Tribal Area, North Waziristan, Pakistan 7 x 3 x 2 cm In this tabular quartz is very easy to find c axis position using striation as a guide. |
|
Viewed: |
31396 Time(s) |

|
Description: |
Quartz Miram Shah Tribal Area, North Waziristan, Pakistan 7 x 3 x 2 cm Some of these Pakistani tabular faden quartz have amazing shapes, but using the striation is easy to find out c axis. |
|
Viewed: |
31372 Time(s) |

|
_________________ Josele |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Richards
Site Admin

Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 846
Location: Northeast Ohio



|
Posted: Apr 09, 2013 19:05 Post subject: Re: Waterclear mineral from Nepal? |
|
|
With these extra images it appears that this could be a faden quartz crystal, which could help explain the unusual habit. And if this is true, it could have a nearly unique morphology because the direction of elongation of the vein is random with respect to the orientation of the initial quartz grain. So faden crystals in a given vein can look quite different from each other.
But, Josele, you did not say whether the last two images were from the same immediate locality as this specimen.
On the other hand, if it's a magnificent albite, there's no reason that other crystals from the cleft should not have similar morphology. Though faden albite is known, appealing to the faden mechanism is not helpful in interpreting this crystal in terms of albite morphology.
I'm beginning to weaken on the albite hypothesis! But we are still lacking important data. And I hate to be wrong!
_________________ Collecting and studying crystals with interesting habits, twinning, and epitaxy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Josele

Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 410
Location: Tarifa, Spain



|
Posted: Apr 10, 2013 04:51 Post subject: Re: Waterclear mineral from Nepal? |
|
|
Last two images are of Pakistani quartz, not from Nepal as the presumed albite-quartz specimen. Yesterday I forget to indicate this in pictures, now is done.
Eric (the owner in Kathmandu) has read this thread and he said me that when the specimen comes back to Nepal from Japan he will take a video and more pictures to post here.
Also he translate from Japanese the test results:
RI: 1,54 - 1,55
"Polarized character is birefringence"
Not fluorescence under LW UV nor SW UV
Thanks again for your help.
_________________ Josele |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Modreski
Site Admin

Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 710
Location: Denver, Colorado



|
Posted: Apr 10, 2013 18:10 Post subject: Re: Waterclear mineral from Nepal? |
|
|
The puzzle continues--but the data do seem to be leaning more toward quartz. The r.i. difference is not large--albite should be around 1.53, and quartz of course, 1.54-1.55, which matches their reported value. I had also thought of mentioning fluorescence, since some (but not all) albite and orthoclase have at least a weak red fluorescence.
I guess personally--I'm inclining toward believing it to be quartz.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Josele

Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 410
Location: Tarifa, Spain



|
Posted: Apr 10, 2013 19:41 Post subject: Re: Waterclear mineral from Nepal? |
|
|
Just to add a picture where can see vertical section of crystal shape.
Sorry if I'm completely wrong but in this matter my paper is as Devil's Advocate.
Description: |
Presumed albite/quartz Ganesh Himal, Dhading District, Bagmati Zone, Nepal crystal size: 8,1 x 4,3 x 1,3 cm Photo & collection: Eric Manandhar
To my understanding, this is a view from c axis (almost). Look at the narrow face below with a sharp edge. Could be a prism face, edges are parallel, but angles with faces at right and left are never described in quartz (I think).
If it is quartz, largest face and shiny faces should be piramidal termination faces, but they are striated ...never seen in quartz. |
|
Viewed: |
30945 Time(s) |

|
_________________ Josele |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Richards
Site Admin

Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 846
Location: Northeast Ohio



|
Posted: Apr 10, 2013 20:32 Post subject: Re: Waterclear mineral from Nepal? |
|
|
Based on Josele's most recent image, here is an attempt to interpret this crystal as quartz. This is very preliminary and hangs primarily on the proposed identifications of the forms along the left side.
I had a challenge to save this image - it was too large for a screen capture, but I was able to extract it from the web pages. However, the aspect ratio changed significantly in the process. I used Photoshop to try to get the proportions about right, but the image may be a bit distorted relative to Josele's.
Description: |
|
Viewed: |
30895 Time(s) |

|
_________________ Collecting and studying crystals with interesting habits, twinning, and epitaxy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Josele

Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 410
Location: Tarifa, Spain



|
Posted: Apr 11, 2013 15:52 Post subject: Re: Waterclear mineral from Nepal? |
|
|
It's a pitty that was me and not Pete or other expert who casually had this specimen in hand in Kathmandu.
Only thing I can do is try to explain that I remember:
- A section of the crystal perpendicular to elongated direction is something like an asymmetrical rhomb, with some bevels.
- Parallel edges with different angles between faces are parallel to elongated direction.
- Larger faces between these parallel edges are very striated.
I can not find any evidence of trigonal symetry and many of mono or triclinic systems.
Description: |
In both sides of the crystal there is striation parallel to edges and to elongated direction. Because of the shape crystal, I only can see one posibility for c axis: parallel to elongated direction and also to edges and to striation. |
|
Viewed: |
30816 Time(s) |

|
_________________ Josele |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Ost

Joined: 18 Mar 2013
Posts: 516
Location: Virginia Beach



|
Posted: Apr 11, 2013 15:57 Post subject: Re: Waterclear mineral from Nepal? |
|
|
I suspect we will get to the bottom of this eventually but in the meantime it is an amazing crystal no matter what flavor.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Josele

Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 410
Location: Tarifa, Spain



|
Posted: Apr 14, 2013 18:59 Post subject: Re: Waterclear mineral from Nepal? |
|
|
After spent much time (I am too headstrong) thinking about Pete Richards last post with interpretation of faces and also Peter Slootweg c axis scheme and unique crystal hypotesis in Mindat, I begin to understand this crystal as quartz.
Thanks to all for your help, I learned a lot with your inputs, and special thanks to Jordi who since the beginning proposed quartz for this crystal.
Description: |
Here can see a larger part of quartz matrix, whose c axis direction seems the same as proposed for Pete Richards and Peter Slootweg and points to a unique crystalline building. |
|
Viewed: |
30553 Time(s) |

|
_________________ Josele |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|