FMF - Friends of Minerals Forum, discussion and message board

[Joan R.]

Alfredo Petrov in his post
https://www.fabreminerals.com/forum/Message-Board/viewtopic.php?p=976#976
was asking about the crystal growth of Pyrite on mud or clay. Searching information to write a post about Ambasaguas Pyrite I found very interesting articles that I would like to reproduce below. First one is a full article but only in Spanish, and the second link is the English abstract.

1.- https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1234123
2.- https://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/84503770/ABSTRACT
Causes of variation in crystal morphology in metamorphogenic pyrite deposits of the Cameros Basin (N Spain)
J. Alonso-Azcárate, M. Rodas, L. Fernández-Díaz, S.H. Bottrell , J. R. Mas, S. López-Andrés
J. Alonso-Azcárate (azcarate@amb-to.uclm.es)
Geological Journal, Vol. 36, n.2, pp. 159-170
The low-grade metasediments of the Cameros Basin, northern Spain, host a number of deposits of spectacular quality pyrite mineralization. These formed during regional metamorphism and the pyrite crystals exhibit a wide range of morphologies. On the basis of pyrite crystal habit, the deposits can be classified into two groups: Group I comprises deposits with cubic, elongated or platy crystals; Group II comprises deposits characterized by pyritohedra and cubo-pyritohedra with striated faces, along with blocky crystals and fine-grained aggregates. Group I deposits are formed in sequences dominated by meandriform fluviatile sediments, while Group II is hosted by deltaic plain and lacustrine metasediments.
Temperature differences between deposits and As content are possible causes of the different pyrite morphologies in the deposits, but no significant variation exists between the two groups for either factor. Comparison with experimentally grown pyrite crystals suggests that Group I deposits have morphologies indicative of lower degrees of pyrite supersaturation than pyrite crystals in Group II deposits. The sedimentary facies hosting Group II deposits provides a greater availability of sedimentary sulphur (pyrite and sulphates). Moreover, reactions involving sulphate during metamorphism may have modified fluid chemistry, which would also act to produce higher degrees of pyrite saturation in fluids derived from the sulphate-rich deltaic plain and lacustrine metasediments hosting the Group II deposits. This hypothesis is confirmed by sulphur isotope data on the pyrites, which show a larger component of 34S-enriched sulphate-derived sulphur in these deposits.