We use cookies to show content based on your preferences. If you continue to browse you accept their use and installation. More information. >


FMF - Friends of Minerals Forum, discussion and message board
The place to share your mineralogical experiences


Spanish message board






Newest topics and users posts
01 Jul-14:47:07 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Alfredo)
01 Jul-09:55:00 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Craig Hagstrom)
01 Jul-05:05:41 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Roger Warin)
01 Jul-01:07:57 The mizunaka collection - elbaite (Am Mizunaka)
30 Jun-21:33:59 Re: some rare phosphates from the democratic republic of congo and zimbabwe (Roger Warin)
30 Jun-14:52:04 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Craig Hagstrom)
30 Jun-14:39:38 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Marco Campos-venuti)
30 Jun-13:55:05 Re: tourmaline namibia? (Izak)
30 Jun-13:07:14 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Craig Hagstrom)
30 Jun-12:24:05 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Marco Campos-venuti)
30 Jun-12:07:00 Re: gwindel skutterudite? (Marco Campos-venuti)
30 Jun-11:52:28 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Craig Hagstrom)
30 Jun-08:17:07 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
30 Jun-07:28:28 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Mim Museum)
30 Jun-03:02:46 Re: some rare phosphates from the democratic republic of congo and zimbabwe (Knut Eldjarn)
29 Jun-18:12:45 Azurite (Silvia)
29 Jun-16:45:52 Sainte-marie-aux-mines 2025 - chalcopyrite and stannite on ferberite (Jordi Fabre)
29 Jun-16:43:42 Some rare phosphates from the democratic republic of congo and zimbabwe (Roger Warin)
29 Jun-13:59:02 Re: gwindel skutterudite? (Pete Richards)
29 Jun-12:07:28 Re: sainte-marie-aux-mines 2025 - media (Carles)
29 Jun-00:14:03 Re: gwindel skutterudite? (Roger Warin)
28 Jun-17:01:58 Sainte-marie-aux-mines 2025 at its height (Jordi Fabre)
28 Jun-15:48:51 Re: sainte-marie-aux-mines 2025 (Carles)
28 Jun-15:43:48 Re: sainte-marie-aux-mines 2025 (Carles)
28 Jun-15:37:55 Re: sainte-marie-aux-mines 2025 (Carles)

For lists of newest topics and postings click here


RSS RSS

View unanswered posts

Why and how to register

Index Index
 FAQFAQ RegisterRegister  Log inLog in
 {Forgotten your password?}Forgotten your password?  

Like
122458


The time now is Jul 02, 2025 02:34

Search for a textSearch for a text   

A general guide for using the Forum with some rules and tips
The information provided within this Forum about localities is only given to allow reference to them. Any visit to any of the localities requires you to obtain full permission and relevant information prior to your visit. FMF is strictly against any illicit activities related to collecting minerals.
Opinions about Mineralogical Record's Article
  Goto page Previous  1, 2
  Index -> The Mineralogical Record
Like


View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Les Presmyk




Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 372
Location: Gilbert, AZ

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: May 18, 2009 11:59    Post subject: Re: Opinions about Mineralogical Record's Article.  

The ability to buy minerals without having to physically see them first has been with the collecting community as long as there has been a postal service. Up until 20 years ago, this part of the hobby was conducted by those dealers willing to spend the time and effort to put together mailing lists and collectors willing to acqurie specimens that way. Obviously, that limited some of the species they could receive but there are many collectors who have built collections that way. Not all of us were lucky enough to be born in Phoenix, Arizona where the Tucson Show was only two hours away.

Twenty years ago, with the advent of video cameras, now a collector could receive a video of a number of specimens being offered for sale. Ten years ago, we watched as the internet became the newest tool to sell minerals. Just like shows, these are all tools that allow dealers and collectors to interact and make deals. Some collectors love shows, other abhor them. Some collectors like buying over the internet and others do not. One is not better than the other, just different. The dealers are no better or worse, because they choose one or more venues to sell their specimens. Finally, there are good dealers and bad, good collectors and bad. The internet does not define the abilities and ethics of a dealer or collector.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   
Display posts from previous:   
   Index -> The Mineralogical Record   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 2 of 2
  Goto page Previous  1, 2  

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


All pictures, text, design © Forum FMF 2006-2025


Powered by FMF