We use cookies to show content based on your preferences. If you continue to browse you accept their use and installation. More information. >

FMF - Friends of Minerals Forum, discussion and message board
The place to share your mineralogical experiences


Spanish message board






Newest topics and users posts
18 Mar-08:12:52 Green seam. Looks like it in a state of decay. (Ning)
18 Mar-06:47:13 Mineralogy & museums 10 - cardiff - 12th-13th august 2024 (Roy Starkey)
18 Mar-02:50:32 Re: collection from dany mabillard (Dany Mabillard)
17 Mar-01:57:58 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
15 Mar-14:27:47 Re: collection of philippe durand (Philippe Durand)
15 Mar-13:49:04 Re: collection of firmo espinar (Firmo Espinar)
15 Mar-09:18:42 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
15 Mar-03:45:43 The mizunaka collection - rhodochrosite (Am Mizunaka)
14 Mar-21:29:31 Re: monthly mineral chronicles, mineral guides and more... (Crocoite)
14 Mar-14:47:27 Re: collection of philippe durand (Jordi Fabre)
14 Mar-13:56:01 Re: collection of philippe durand (Philippe Durand)
14 Mar-11:24:43 Re: collection of philippe durand (Jordi Fabre)
14 Mar-08:55:22 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
14 Mar-08:44:47 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Mim Museum)
14 Mar-07:24:12 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
14 Mar-02:30:15 The mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
14 Mar-02:20:37 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Tobi)
13 Mar-23:40:08 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
13 Mar-14:22:58 Re: don lum collection (Don Lum)
13 Mar-14:02:43 Re: collection of philippe durand (Philippe Durand)
13 Mar-00:57:48 The mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
12 Mar-07:36:06 Re: can you recommend a lab to analyse specimens (Luiz Oliveira)
11 Mar-16:19:18 Re: collection of philippe durand (Riccardo Modanesi)
11 Mar-15:18:26 Re: collection of philippe durand (Philippe Durand)
11 Mar-15:13:07 Re: collection of philippe durand (Philippe Durand)

For lists of newest topics and postings click here


RSS RSS

View unanswered posts

Why and how to register

Index Index
 FAQFAQ RegisterRegister  Log inLog in
 {Forgotten your password?}Forgotten your password?  

Like
111630


The time now is Mar 19, 2024 03:07

Search for a textSearch for a text   

A general guide for using the Forum with some rules and tips
The information provided within this Forum about localities is only given to allow reference to them. Any visit to any of the localities requires you to obtain full permission and relevant information prior to your visit. FMF is strictly against any illicit activities related to collecting minerals.
Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado
  
  Index -> Incorrect classification and fakes
Like
4


View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

John S. White
Site Admin



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1295
Location: Stewartstown, Pennsylvania, USA


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 11:24    Post subject: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

For some years prior to 1976 there were many pyrite specimens from the Rico mining district, Dolores County, Colorado, that were being sold as pyrite with a very thin blue-gray coating of bravoite, thought to be a nickel-rich pyrite but now no longer regarded as a legitimate species. It is not known who is responsible for assigning this name to the coating. In 1976, in a paper in the Mineralogical Record by R. A. Kosnar and H. W. Miller (vol. 7, pp. 278-307) it was stated that "emission spectrographic analysis indicated the presence of copper only" in the film and the authors guessed that it must be chalcocite.

Recently Jordi Fabre acquired a specimen that was labeled bravoite coating pyrite from the Colorado locality and he was suspicious, so he had the film analyzed. It was analyzed by energy dispersive spectroscopy coupled with scanning electron microscopy (SEM-EDS).
The results of the analysis showed only traces of zinc, so the film clearly is not nickeloan pyrite and not chalcocite. Probably, the film is simply due to an incipient surface alteration of the pyrite. The presence of traces of Zn may be due to the presence of sphalerite micro-inclusions.

Gracefully submitted in the interest of advancing the understanding of the diverse mineral world on the part of the uninformed.

_________________
John S. White
aka Rondinaire
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 4888
Location: Barcelona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 11:54    Post subject: Re: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

Two images of the Pyrite incorrectly labeled Bravoite.

Jordi



Pyrite not Bravoite.jpg
 Description:
Sample 3: Possible Bravoite, USA
Result: Pyrite
The grey color of some surfaces that gave it the "funny" name of Bravoite it is just a patina of surface alteration. It is a Pyrite slightly altered without traces of Ni or Cu, so it is nor Chalcocite. Only Zn was detected as traces of heavy metals.
 Viewed:  45431 Time(s)

Pyrite not Bravoite.jpg



Pyrite not Bravoite detail.jpg
 Description:
Rear
 Viewed:  45442 Time(s)

Pyrite not Bravoite detail.jpg


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Pete Modreski
Site Admin



Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 709
Location: Denver, Colorado


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 12:04    Post subject: Re: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

John, & the Forum, I'll just add,
I was involved in helping to examine these supposed bravoite-coated pyrite crystals from Rico when we did research for our book, Minerals of Colorado (1997). Analysis of the nature of the surface of the pyrite crystals was difficult because the gray, metallic surface film was so very thin.

My results, as we described them in Minerals of Colorado, were that the surface contained Mo in addition to trace amounts of Pb and Zn, and an X-ray diffraction pattern showed faint lines of molybdenite. Our conclusion was that the shiny gray metallic surface film was a very thin coating of molybdenite on the pyrite.

(One factor that makes the recognition of the molybdenum by SEM-EDS difficult is that the strongest X-ray emission lines of sulfur and Mo almost coincide, so that the presence of Mo is easily masked by the sulfur in the underlying pyrite.)

Sincerely, Pete
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Pete Modreski
Site Admin



Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 709
Location: Denver, Colorado


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 12:08    Post subject: Re: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

P.S. to Jordi,
The specimens of which you just posted photos, look to be almost all pyrite; any surface coating seems nearly imperceptible. Others that I have seen have had a much more pronounced metallic-gray surface coating.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 4888
Location: Barcelona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 12:31    Post subject: Re: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

Great, more information!. On our analysis the Mo didn't appear, but maybe this is just on my specimen. It comes from Folch collection; he purchased it in Tucson probably around 1979, and, unfortunately, there is no dealer name on the former label.

Anyway, the most important thing is that after your and my analysis, the thin coating for sure is not Bravoite.

Jordi



Pyrite not Bravoite label.jpg
 Description:
Former label of the specimen
 Viewed:  45370 Time(s)

Pyrite not Bravoite label.jpg


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

John Jaszczak




Joined: 05 Oct 2010
Posts: 300
Location: Hancock, MI


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Jul 12, 2012 11:34    Post subject: Re: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

Pete,
Were you able to get a Raman spectrum? Moly and sulfur have some overlapping peaks in EDS, but the Raman spectrum of molybdenite should be fairly distinctive.
Cheers,
John
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Pete Modreski
Site Admin



Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 709
Location: Denver, Colorado


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Jul 12, 2012 12:07    Post subject: Re: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

Hi John, picking up on this thread after a long lapse! No, I didn't have ready access to any Raman equipment at the time I examined that specimen, so I just tried the XRD, using a powder camera. Haven't tried anything further since; the specimen on which I examined the coating was one from the DMNS collection.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

John Jaszczak




Joined: 05 Oct 2010
Posts: 300
Location: Hancock, MI


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Jul 12, 2012 12:24    Post subject: Re: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

I may not have had access to Raman then either like I do now. I think I may have a Gilman sample. If I do, I'll see if I can check it out.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Pete Modreski
Site Admin



Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 709
Location: Denver, Colorado


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Jul 12, 2012 12:40    Post subject: Re: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

P.S., John, we're going to be in Houghton, at Michigan Tech, TWICE next month, for two different events! First the MESTA field conference, and then the following weekend, for a Michigan State geology alumni field conference. So, I'll hope to see you there, one or the other of those times! Catch you later,
Pete
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Kevin Conroy




Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Posts: 78
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 18, 2019 17:08    Post subject: Re: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

I was just wondering if the molybdenum coatings were confirmed for the gray stuff on all of the pyrite from the Rico area mines. I'm having a little trouble finding references online so I figured I would ask.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Mathias




Joined: 01 Apr 2018
Posts: 146
Location: Vlodrop

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 19, 2019 01:12    Post subject: Re: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

Hi Regarding Bravoite....
I visited the Liege Mineral show (Belgium) last Saturday and I bought a small Bravoite specimen from Peru (for €12).... It has a metallic appearance, looks like Skutterudite from Morocco from the outside, but you can clearly see (on the sides) that it is a layer on Pyrite. I'll post some photos later.
Mathias
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Mathias




Joined: 01 Apr 2018
Posts: 146
Location: Vlodrop

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Nov 23, 2019 07:55    Post subject: Re: Specimens incorrectly labeled Bravoite coating Pyrite from Colorado  

This is the "Bravoite" that I purchased last week in Liege, Belgium

One can see that it is a Pyrite specimen with a thin layer (0.5 mm) of what is supposed to be "Bravoite". I purchased it because I have special interest in sulpides and sulfosalts, and I'd never heard of Bravoite before. The vendor had 3 specimens available and I bought the one I liked most. They were all in the very, very affordable price range.



744C.JPG
 Locality:
Cerro de Pasco, Pasco Province, Pasco Department, Peru
 Dimensions: 4 cm * 3 cm * 3 cm
 Description:
 Viewed:  23072 Time(s)

744C.JPG


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
4
   
Display posts from previous:   
   Index -> Incorrect classification and fakes   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1
    

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


All pictures, text, design © Forum FMF 2006-2024


Powered by FMF