View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Casimir Sarisky
Joined: 14 Jun 2015
Posts: 56
Location: Maryland



|
Posted: Aug 31, 2015 14:26 Post subject: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
Hello,
I received a few photos of a mineral specimen from a seller stating the specimen is damage free. I myself have not detected any based on the pics but I would like a second opinion.
Anyone interested in taking a look? Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fiebre Verde

Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 944
Location: Paris Area



|
Posted: Aug 31, 2015 14:37 Post subject: Re: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
Not sure if the seller would be happy to have her/his photos published on this forum for quality control purposes...
Gérard |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GneissWare

Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 1287
Location: California



|
Posted: Aug 31, 2015 14:48 Post subject: Re: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
Casimir Sarisky wrote: | Hello,
I received a few photos of a mineral specimen from a seller stating the specimen is damage free. I myself have not detected any based on the pics but I would like a second opinion.
Anyone interested in taking a look? Thanks. |
If the dealer accepts returns, then all it will likely cost is return shipping if you hold it in your hands, and decide you don't like it.
Photos never faithfully reproduce a specimen. Sometimes the photos make an item look damaged when it is not, and vice versa. Camera sensors also can't reliably capture the same range and subtlety of colors that a human eye can see. That is why most of us internet dealers send minerals out for personal inspection, and accept returns. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Casimir Sarisky
Joined: 14 Jun 2015
Posts: 56
Location: Maryland



|
Posted: Aug 31, 2015 14:55 Post subject: Re: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
Fiebre Verde wrote: | Not sure if the seller would be happy to have her/his photos published on this forum for quality control purposes...
Gérard |
I would not publish them online, only through messaging. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Casimir Sarisky
Joined: 14 Jun 2015
Posts: 56
Location: Maryland



|
Posted: Aug 31, 2015 14:56 Post subject: Re: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
GneissWare wrote: | Casimir Sarisky wrote: | Hello,
I received a few photos of a mineral specimen from a seller stating the specimen is damage free. I myself have not detected any based on the pics but I would like a second opinion.
Anyone interested in taking a look? Thanks. |
If the dealer accepts returns, then all it will likely cost is return shipping if you hold it in your hands, and decide you don't like it.
Photos never faithfully reproduce a specimen. Sometimes the photos make an item look damaged when it is not, and vice versa. Camera sensors also can't reliable capture the same range and subtlety of colors that a human eye can see. That is why most of us internet dealers send minerals out for personal inspection, and accept returns. |
The seller is from Europe and the specimen is a large cabinet size. I know returning via USPS international will be expensive. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tracy

Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 551
Location: Toronto



|
Posted: Sep 03, 2015 07:20 Post subject: Re: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
Without commenting on photos,"damage free" is a relative term. Completely intact all the way around, nothing showing on presentation face, main crystals intact but some nicks where it was trimmed, contacted areas, only visible under a microscope, internal cloudiness,...where does one draw the line? One person's "defective" is another person's "perfection" (or, at least, "don't care").
- Tracy _________________ "Wisdom begins in wonder" - Socrates |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Casimir Sarisky
Joined: 14 Jun 2015
Posts: 56
Location: Maryland



|
Posted: Sep 03, 2015 13:18 Post subject: Re: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
Tracy wrote: | Without commenting on photos,"damage free" is a relative term. Completely intact all the way around, nothing showing on presentation face, main crystals intact but some nicks where it was trimmed, contacted areas, only visible under a microscope, internal cloudiness,...where does one draw the line? One person's "defective" is another person's "perfection" (or, at least, "don't care").
- Tracy |
Well when you have OCD and are prone to noticing the details like myself, I am definitely have somewhat higher expectations than the average collector. For me that would be any nicks, cleaves, bruises, dings, wear, and contact damage on the crystals. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tracy

Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 551
Location: Toronto



|
Posted: Sep 03, 2015 20:14 Post subject: Re: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
Hi Casimir. Catching up on things, I see that my thought was already expressed by Alfredo and Peter in an earlier post of yours. No need to pick it up again (and nice to know I'm in good company).
- Tracy _________________ "Wisdom begins in wonder" - Socrates |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Casimir Sarisky
Joined: 14 Jun 2015
Posts: 56
Location: Maryland



|
Posted: Sep 04, 2015 00:52 Post subject: Re: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
Tracy wrote: | Hi Casimir. Catching up on things, I see that my thought was already expressed by Alfredo and Peter in an earlier post of yours. No need to pick it up again (and nice to know I'm in good company).
- Tracy |
If I had a larger budget and more room for a large collection, my opinion would be different. But with my circumstances, a small high-quality mineral collection is ideal for me.
I do have a few specimens with minor to light damage, as shown on my collection thread. For my rarer and more valued pieces, I prefer undamaged specimens.
I hope that makes sense to you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pierre Joubert
Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Posts: 1605
Location: Western Cape



|
Posted: Sep 04, 2015 03:25 Post subject: Re: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
Casimir Sarisky wrote: | Tracy wrote: | Hi Casimir. Catching up on things, I see that my thought was already expressed by Alfredo and Peter in an earlier post of yours. No need to pick it up again (and nice to know I'm in good company).
- Tracy |
If I had a larger budget and more room for a large collection, my opinion would be different. But with my circumstances, a small high-quality mineral collection is ideal for me.
I do have a few specimens with minor to light damage, as shown on my collection thread. For my rarer and more valued pieces, I prefer undamaged specimens.
I hope that makes sense to you. |
Hi Casimir, With a limited budget and space, I would concentrate on micromounts:-) _________________ Pierre Joubert
'The tree of silence bears the fruit of peace. ' |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Casimir Sarisky
Joined: 14 Jun 2015
Posts: 56
Location: Maryland



|
Posted: Sep 04, 2015 13:02 Post subject: Re: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
Pierre Joubert wrote: | Casimir Sarisky wrote: | Tracy wrote: | Hi Casimir. Catching up on things, I see that my thought was already expressed by Alfredo and Peter in an earlier post of yours. No need to pick it up again (and nice to know I'm in good company).
- Tracy |
If I had a larger budget and more room for a large collection, my opinion would be different. But with my circumstances, a small high-quality mineral collection is ideal for me.
I do have a few specimens with minor to light damage, as shown on my collection thread. For my rarer and more valued pieces, I prefer undamaged specimens.
I hope that makes sense to you. |
Hi Casimir, With a limited budget and space, I would concentrate on micromounts:-) |
That would be a good idea if I was interested in them, but I do not have the equipment to appreciate them. Plus I like holding my specimens up close with my eyes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pierre Joubert
Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Posts: 1605
Location: Western Cape



|
Posted: Sep 05, 2015 01:52 Post subject: Re: Could Use A Second Opinion: Look At Mineral Pictures |
|
|
Casimir Sarisky wrote: | That would be a good idea if I was interested in them, but I do not have the equipment to appreciate them. Plus I like holding my specimens up close with my eyes. |
Sorry Casimir, that was a bit 'tongue in the cheek'. You are right, micromounts are fine if you have all the right equipment to appreciate their detail. _________________ Pierre Joubert
'The tree of silence bears the fruit of peace. ' |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|