View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pete Richards
Site Admin

Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 842
Location: Northeast Ohio



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 13:45 Post subject: Rutile locality? |
|
|
Here is a nice little rutile twin on {101}. It claims to be from Graves Mountain, but I question that attribution, and RutileFox agrees that it is suspect. Does anyone have an alternative locality to suggest? What observations support your suggestion, if you have one?
Mineral: | Rutile |
Dimensions: | 2 cm wide |
Description: |
Front view. Back view is very similar. |
|
Viewed: |
21325 Time(s) |

|
Description: |
|
Viewed: |
21297 Time(s) |

|
Description: |
Left end (sorry about the lack of focus!) |
|
Viewed: |
21335 Time(s) |

|
Description: |
|
Viewed: |
21339 Time(s) |

|
_________________ Collecting and studying crystals with interesting habits, twinning, and epitaxy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kushmeja
Joined: 28 Jul 2014
Posts: 244
Location: New Jersey



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 14:03 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
Could be from Chester County, Pennsylvania. Most of the PA rutiles have striations like yours, and similar twins occur there as well.
I have a lot of Grave Mountain rutiles & have a focus on them for my collection, and I would agree that it doesn't look like it is from there. Graves rutiles don't typically have striations like yours does, although I have seen a few with them, but only 1 or 2 ever with striations to the extent that your has.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Betts
Joined: 07 Jun 2012
Posts: 209
Location: New York City


|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 14:09 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
I doubt it is from Pa. which were found in farmer's fields and had abraded edges.
_________________ John Betts |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kushmeja
Joined: 28 Jul 2014
Posts: 244
Location: New Jersey



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 14:23 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
I would agree that most PA rutiles are pretty eroded for sure, but I have this one that is from Parkesburg that is quite sharp, and there are also pics on Mindat of a few with very sharp edges as well. Sorry for the poor pic, don't have my photo setup up.
Mineral: | Rutile |
Description: |
|
Viewed: |
21311 Time(s) |

|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Richards
Site Admin

Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 842
Location: Northeast Ohio



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 15:19 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
kushmeja wrote: | Could be from Chester County, Pennsylvania. Most of the PA rutiles have striations like yours, and similar twins occur there as well.
I have a lot of Grave Mountain rutiles & have a focus on them for my collection, and I would agree that it doesn't look like it is from there. Graves rutiles don't typically have striations like yours does, although I have seen a few with them, but only 1 or 2 ever with striations to the extent that your has. |
Thanks for your thoughts!
I have to agree with John Betts that Chester County does not seem right. In addition to the question of wear, my impression of Chester County rutiles is that they are not as cleanly formed as this one - more prone to having overlapping ridges like yours does.
But I agree with you that this crystal does not look right for Graves Mountain. Not only the striations, but the balanced, symmetric form, seems unusual to me. My perspective may be biased by what I found on two trips there, but most of mine are much less regular. And there's no sign of pyrophyllite or kyanite on this guy - no other mineral, in fact.
I would add to the general discussion that there are just two striated faces on each part of the twin, the front as I have shown and the back. The other faces, both on the prism and on the termination, are pretty planar and free of striations.
_________________ Collecting and studying crystals with interesting habits, twinning, and epitaxy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Betts
Joined: 07 Jun 2012
Posts: 209
Location: New York City


|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 15:50 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
If RutileFox does not know then who would?
He has the best rutile collection I am aware of...
_________________ John Betts |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alfredo
Site Admin

Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 1011



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 15:59 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
If I saw that piece without knowing what it was, I'd guess it was cassiterite rather than rutile, but I suppose that's just my Bolivian bias showing, and my absence of familiarity with rutile. (And being glued to a post like that makes it hard to check the density.)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bob Morgan
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Posts: 250
Location: Savannah, Georgia



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 16:52 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
The closest to your's appearance from this country that's on mindat is from California - both blocky and few striations.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Richards
Site Admin

Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 842
Location: Northeast Ohio



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 16:57 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
To John Betts: Yes, it's true.
To Alfredo: Yes, it's true. But I do think it's rutile. Right now I don't have access to the appropriate tools to check, sadly.
To Bob: Champion Mine? or elsewhere in California? I have thought about California as well.
Thanks to all!
_________________ Collecting and studying crystals with interesting habits, twinning, and epitaxy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bob Morgan
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Posts: 250
Location: Savannah, Georgia



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 17:30 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
Yes Champion
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alfredo
Site Admin

Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 1011



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 17:40 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
Pete, I'm sure you're right about it being rutile versus cassiterite but, in case you ever need a method to test without having to unmount it from its stand, an electrician's meter should work. Rutile does not conduct electric current as far as I know, but cassiterite is a conductor, more or less, depending on the elemental impurities present.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Richards
Site Admin

Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 842
Location: Northeast Ohio



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 17:49 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
alfredo wrote: | Pete, I'm sure you're right about it being rutile versus cassiterite but, in case you ever need a method to test without having to unmount it from its stand, an electrician's meter should work. Rutile does not conduct electric current as far as I know, but cassiterite is a conductor, more or less, depending on the elemental impurities present. |
This is interesting! Do you just use the meter as a continuity meter, or actually measure resistance?
Thanks, Alfredo! It's worth playing with.
_________________ Collecting and studying crystals with interesting habits, twinning, and epitaxy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alfredo
Site Admin

Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 1011



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 18:13 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
A friend of mine is an avid hunter of gold with a metal detector and he was complaining to me that certain minerals caused him trouble because they sounded "hot" on the detector and caused him to perform sweaty work for nothing. Among the worst offenders were graphite, pyrrhotite, covellite, and galena. So that chat aroused my curiosity about what other minerals might conduct electrons, and why electrical properties are not, apparently, studied by mineralogists or included in new species descriptions. So I started testing everything in my collection at the time that was big enough to test, no micromounts. Of course just low grade qualitative study, nothing quantitative. Quantitative work would I guess be not very meaningful unless using standard sizes and shapes of specimen, resistance increasing with thickness, etc. Did get some interesting results, for example, sulphides with metallic luster (so not counting things like sphalerite, realgar, etc) are far better conductors than sulphosalts, so for a massive grey unidentifiable chunk, the conductivity will at least tell you whether you have a sulphide or sulphosalt.
The only mineral with non-metallic luster that I could find that conducted to some extent was my Bolivian cassiterites. Later I heard that there was a patent for coating automobile glass with thin transparent cassiterite films to conduct current to heat it for defrosting, without embedding wires in the glass. There is one other non-metallic mineral that allegedly conducts current, blue diamonds, which are naturally boron doped, but so far I haven't persuaded anyone to donate me a nice blue diamond for testing. ;((
Then there are the weird minerals that conduct protons instead of electrons, and those are not metallic at all, like vivianite, for example.
Apologies for wandering way off the rutile locality topic here.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Farquhar
Site Admin

Joined: 14 May 2011
Posts: 52
Location: Virginia



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 19:47 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
John Betts wrote: | If RutileFox does not know then who would?
He has the best rutile collection I am aware of... |
My thanks to Pete Richards for posting this challenge, and to John Betts for his call to action. After an extensive review of many rutile specimens, I've found a likely match and some interesting historical documentation that may explain the mistaken labeling from Graves Mountain.
The results are quite surprising, so please allow me a day or so for the write-up and photographs. Please stay tuned to this FMF thread ...
Peter Farquhar
"RutileFox"
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rweaver
Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 259
Location: Ridgecrest, California



|
Posted: Dec 17, 2020 20:25 Post subject: Re: Rutile locality? |
|
|
Pete Richards wrote: | To John Betts: Yes, it's true.
To Alfredo: Yes, it's true. But I do think it's rutile. Right now I don't have access to the appropriate tools to check, sadly.
To Bob: Champion Mine? or elsewhere in California? I have thought about California as well.
Thanks to all! |
I have never seen one like that from the Champion Spark Plug Mine, near Chalfant Valley, California.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|