View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rocks2dust
Joined: 23 Jul 2013
Posts: 9
Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2015 21:54 Post subject: Mounting very tiny specimens |
|
|
I'd like to securely mount some dust-speck size specimens in MM boxes. I want them to be easily removable if I decide to look at them under a microscope, but still attractive and readily visible if I want to look using a hand lens. The only methods I can recall being used are double-stick tape (I'm not sure how well this holds up) and enclosing the speck in a clear capsule (has optical distortion). I don't want to lose the little things, either, and mashing them into mineral tack seems like it would hide some of the specimen. What do folks use in this situation? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alfredo
Site Admin
Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 981
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2015 22:19 Post subject: Re: Mounting very tiny specimens |
|
|
A cat's whisker (the cat won't mind if you cut one off while she's sleeping). Dip the tip into water soluble white glue, then touch the droplet to the dust grain. After it dries, hold the whisker in the middle with tweezers while you glue the other end of the whisker to the bottom of the micromount box. Can always be removed later by soaking in warm water if you need to.
If bigger than a dust grain (more like a sand grain), use a cactus spine (the cactus won't mind if you cut one off while its sleeping), painted with matte black ink. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
James Catmur
Site Admin
Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 1351
Location: Cambridge
|
Posted: Nov 13, 2015 02:50 Post subject: Re: Mounting very tiny specimens |
|
|
Those very long, strong, thin cactus spines must be great for this! I would never have thought of that (and even less the cat's whisker). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Reinhardt van Vuuren
Joined: 10 Mar 2015
Posts: 55
Location: Port Elizabeth
|
Posted: Nov 13, 2015 05:30 Post subject: Re: Mounting very tiny specimens |
|
|
alfredo wrote: | A cat's whisker (the cat won't mind if you cut one off while she's sleeping). Dip the tip into water soluble white glue, then touch the droplet to the dust grain. After it dries, hold the whisker in the middle with tweezers while you glue the other end of the whisker to the bottom of the micromount box. Can always be removed later by soaking in warm water if you need to.
If bigger than a dust grain (more like a sand grain), use a cactus spine (the cactus won't mind if you cut one off while its sleeping), painted with matte black ink. |
I've heard of the cat whisker technique but the sleeping cactus is new to me, also had a good chuckle obviously. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vicen
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 20
Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Nov 16, 2015 05:03 Post subject: Re: Mounting very tiny specimens |
|
|
Hi,
I use a porcupine quill instead of a cactus spine. I have been using them for ages and they are great not to damage the specimens. The porcupine quills are harder than wood and softer than metal.
Regarding the adhesive, I will recommend you use Paraloid B72 which can be dissolved with acetone and can be made into the needed consistency. It doesn’t yellow or degrade with time.
Remember that not all minerals allow humidity, and by using an adhesive that dissolve with acetone the evaporation will be faster.
The white glue will need water to be dissolved and even, sometimes, you will need to leave the mineral in water for some hours to be able to dissolve it. The adhesive could be brutal and collapse with time and will get yellow. _________________ Geological Conservator/Preparator
Natural Sciences Department
National Museums Scotland
242 West Granton Road
Edinburgh EH5 1JA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Les Presmyk
Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 372
Location: Gilbert, AZ
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2015 16:35 Post subject: Re: Mounting very tiny specimens |
|
|
While I am not a micromounter, while growing up as a junior member of the Mineralogical Society of Arizona, I was surrounded by some of the country's best micromounters including Marv and Virginia Deshler, Phyllis Sonnenberg and Marc Watson, to name a few. While I never caught the bug for that part of the hobby, I remember discussions of the various materials they used for mounting very small crystals. Of course, being a the Arizona-Sonora Desert, thorns and spines from various cacti species seemed almost natural.
Fundamentally, go to the micromounters and discover what they use. They are the experts. After all, cactus spines and thorns are probably not available to someone living in a lot of the world.
I think I would rather snatch a spine from a sleeping cactus rather than trying to chase down a porcupine! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
James Catmur
Site Admin
Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 1351
Location: Cambridge
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2015 17:54 Post subject: Re: Mounting very tiny specimens |
|
|
You can just buy them so no need to hunt them down! Search the web for 'porcupine quills for sale'. Amazing what one can buy nowadays. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alfredo
Site Admin
Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 981
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2015 18:03 Post subject: Re: Mounting very tiny specimens |
|
|
I'd have to add a Hollywood-type disclaimer to my micromounts: "No porcupines were hurt in the making of this micromount". ;)) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Les Presmyk
Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 372
Location: Gilbert, AZ
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2015 18:11 Post subject: Re: Mounting very tiny specimens |
|
|
The disclaimer should include cacti and people's cats. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pierre Joubert
Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Posts: 1605
Location: Western Cape
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2015 04:11 Post subject: Re: Mounting very tiny specimens |
|
|
I would like to use this opportunity to mention that I am prepared to swop my limited stock of porcupine quills for deep red rhodocrosite specimens:-) _________________ Pierre Joubert
'The tree of silence bears the fruit of peace. ' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rocks2dust
Joined: 23 Jul 2013
Posts: 9
Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Nov 26, 2015 12:29 Post subject: Re: Mounting very tiny specimens |
|
|
Thank you all for interesting ideas.
Has anyone used something like Thermoweb's Zots (adhesive dots)? They supposedly use an archival-quality, acid-free adhesive that stays removable. For the dust-like specimens, I'm thinking it would be a bit less nervewracking to unmount from a removable adhesive. On the negative side, I'd wonder about bits of actual dust sticking before the box gets closed again.
I suppose there are pros and cons for every method, e.g., acetone would evaporate quickly to allow retrieval from a shallow dish, but does tend to etch anything plastic nearby. I find the gelatin capsules I've been using to be ugly and in any event having too much optical distortion to examine without popping them open. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|