View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Tobi
Site Admin

Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 4235
Location: Germany



|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Warin

Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 1231



|
Posted: Mar 21, 2013 08:46 Post subject: Re: 2012's winners of the LAPIS Magazine photo contest |
|
|
vielen Dank, extra Fotos
Roger. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Ost

Joined: 18 Mar 2013
Posts: 516
Location: Virginia Beach



|
Posted: Mar 21, 2013 17:42 Post subject: Re: 2012's winners of the LAPIS Magazine photo contest |
|
|
Thanks for sharing these. Most fine. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nico78
Joined: 31 Oct 2012
Posts: 34
Location: Paris



|
Posted: Mar 29, 2013 16:53 Post subject: Re: 2012's winners of the LAPIS Magazine photo contest |
|
|
Finally, It's not really great specimens!
It's the quality of the picture and the artistic touch that is Awesome in this kind of contest! _________________ Young french geologist engineer somewhere around the world .
Also forgive me for my english syntax! I'm not yet fluent! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tobi
Site Admin

Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 4235
Location: Germany



|
Posted: Mar 30, 2013 04:34 Post subject: Re: 2012's winners of the LAPIS Magazine photo contest |
|
|
Nico78 wrote: | Finally, It's not really great specimens!
It's the quality of the picture and the artistic touch that is Awesome in this kind of contest! |
Sure, this is a PHOTO contest, not a specimen contest. And i do not agree that there are no great specimens: You really say that the Hardangervidda anatase or the Malmberget calcite on that page are "not really great"? Sorry, you're wrong, they are extraordinary and very fine specimens.
Cheers!
Tobi |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|