We use cookies to show content based on your preferences. If you continue to browse you accept their use and installation. More information. >


FMF - Friends of Minerals Forum, discussion and message board
The place to share your mineralogical experiences


Spanish message board






Newest topics and users posts
29 Apr-22:26:22 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
29 Apr-17:56:49 The mizunaka collection - agate (Am Mizunaka)
29 Apr-16:45:46 Rutile from boiling springs, usa / mvm (minerals - virtual museum) collection (Jordi Fabre)
29 Apr-11:50:01 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Craig Hagstrom)
29 Apr-08:23:04 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
28 Apr-13:43:16 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Philippe Durand)
28 Apr-13:41:44 Re: munich show (mineralientage) 2023 (Philippe Durand)
27 Apr-15:08:36 Re: collection of joseph d'oliveira (Joseph Doliveira)
27 Apr-09:22:16 Re: the mim museum in beirut, lebanon (Mim Museum)
26 Apr-22:30:18 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
26 Apr-17:32:07 Topaz on albite from pakistan / mvm (minerals - virtual museum) collection (Jordi Fabre)
26 Apr-17:12:33 Re: collection of joseph d'oliveira (Joseph Doliveira)
26 Apr-15:06:49 The mizunaka collection - adularia (Am Mizunaka)
26 Apr-09:23:05 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
25 Apr-16:30:00 Smithsonite (cu-bearing) from tsumeb / mvm (minerals - virtual museum) collection (Jordi Fabre)
25 Apr-10:42:35 Re: collection of joseph d'oliveira (Joseph Doliveira)
24 Apr-15:16:46 Re: if anybody knows this gemstone, please tell me (Riccardo Modanesi)
24 Apr-12:18:57 Re: collection of enrique llorens (Enrique Llorens)
24 Apr-10:59:20 Re: if anybody knows this gemstone, please tell me (Gemstonebank)
23 Apr-22:50:59 Re: collection of volkmar stingl (Volkmar Stingl)
23 Apr-16:34:26 Pyromorphite from el horcajo mines, spain / mvm (minerals - virtual museum) collection (Jordi Fabre)
23 Apr-14:49:53 The mizunaka collection - quartz (Am Mizunaka)
23 Apr-14:05:56 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
23 Apr-01:56:02 The mizunaka collection - rhodochrosite (Am Mizunaka)
22 Apr-15:21:46 Re: arsenopyrite, löllingite, and large baryte xx - but location help needed (Jordi Fabre)

For lists of newest topics and postings click here


RSS RSS

View unanswered posts

Why and how to register

Index Index
 FAQFAQ RegisterRegister  Log inLog in
 {Forgotten your password?}Forgotten your password?  

Like
120924


The time now is Apr 29, 2025 22:40

Search for a textSearch for a text   

A general guide for using the Forum with some rules and tips
The information provided within this Forum about localities is only given to allow reference to them. Any visit to any of the localities requires you to obtain full permission and relevant information prior to your visit. FMF is strictly against any illicit activities related to collecting minerals.
cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section
  Goto page 1, 2  Next
  Index -> Minerals and Mineralogy
Like
6


View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Daniel Garcia




Joined: 02 May 2022
Posts: 23
Location: Narbonne

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 03:34    Post subject: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

Dear all

I'm trying to document a silicification event in Oligocene evaporites near Narbonne (France)
The host rock is gypsiferous, with some diagenetic native sulfur. Silicification occurs sporadically, either as thin layers intercalated with clays and microcystalline gypsum (algal laminae ?) or as dispersed spherulites with a distinct zoning pattern. My question is how much cristobalite and how much chalcedony in these assemblages ?



Mv25A_2LP.jpg
 Mineral: cristobalite
 Dimensions: 1 x 2 mm
 Description:
PPL image. Spherulites in gypsum sandy layer
 Viewed:  3547 Time(s)

Mv25A_2LP.jpg


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

marco campos-venuti




Joined: 09 Apr 2014
Posts: 225
Location: Sevilla


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 03:40    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

Cristobalite is high T mineral. All supposed cristobalite spherulites are other silica phase.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Daniel Garcia




Joined: 02 May 2022
Posts: 23
Location: Narbonne

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 04:07    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

marco campos-venuti wrote:
Cristobalite is high T mineral. All supposed cristobalite spherulites are other silica phase.


So, no way to identify the textural pattern ?

Here is a macro view of the spherulites



JV4.jpg
 Mineral: cristobalite
 Dimensions: 0.5 x 1 cm
 Description:
spherulites on gypsum
 Viewed:  3533 Time(s)

JV4.jpg


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
1
   

marco campos-venuti




Joined: 09 Apr 2014
Posts: 225
Location: Sevilla


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 05:38    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

My impression is that it is all chalcedony. Chalcedony is a fibrous silica polymer so the structure you see in thin section looks very similar to it. Cristobalite is stable over 1470ºC, Therefore it is impossible to find it in a diagenetic environment. I have written several books about the equilibrium of microcrystalline silica phases that you can see on my website.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
1
   

Daniel Garcia




Joined: 02 May 2022
Posts: 23
Location: Narbonne

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 06:53    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

marco campos-venuti wrote:
My impression is that it is all chalcedony. Chalcedony is a fibrous silica polymer so the structure you see in thin section looks very similar to it. Cristobalite is stable over 1470 C, Therefore it is impossible to find it in a diagenetic environment. I have written several books about the equilibrium of microcrystalline silica phases that you can see on my website.


Hi Marco, thanks. Of course, I don't claim cristobalite to be a stable phase here.
I just try to understand what controls the intergrowth pattern of the fibers, Here is another view of this texture



Mv13_9LN.jpg
 Mineral: cristobalite
 Dimensions: 0.5 x 1 mm
 Description:
PPL view microcristalline silica replacing gypsum
 Viewed:  3505 Time(s)

Mv13_9LN.jpg



Mv13_9LP.jpg
 Mineral: cristobalite
 Dimensions: 0.5 x 1 mm
 Description:
XPL view microcystalline silica replacing gypsum
 Viewed:  3506 Time(s)

Mv13_9LP.jpg


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

marco campos-venuti




Joined: 09 Apr 2014
Posts: 225
Location: Sevilla


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 07:59    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

I don't see replacing after gypsum. The formation of your spherulites looks like the growth of a concretion. There is a granular gypsum with porosity. A Si-rich solution flows through the porosity. The solution dehydrates and polymerizes. Monomeric Si ions become dimers, then trimers, etc. When the ions reach 1 nm in diameter we have a colloidal solution that behaves like a hydrogel. When this dehydrates further, it begins to crystallize the chalcedony which is fibrous. Chalcedony is the stable phase in an acidic environment, if the conditions are basic we have opal. New space is created on the external surface of the chalcedony by dissolution. Little by little one band at a time the spherulite grows. Compared to the crystallization of quartz crystals in gypsum Keuper deposits, in your case the climate must have been hot and dry. Without a doubt we are in subaerial conditions because the hydrogel is water-soluble and does not form under water.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
2
   

Peter Megaw
Site Admin



Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 973
Location: Tucson, Arizona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 09:08    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

Robert Folk taught that length-slow chalcedony was indicative of formation under evaporitic or sulfate rich conditions. If you have a gyp plate you could check that out
_________________
Siempre Adelante!
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Roger Warin




Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 1231


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 09:14    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

As I observed in LDG, cristobalite microcrystals readily aggregate into micro-ourses that occupy an intercalated phase (spherules) in another phase, as in semi-crystalline polymers.
I insist to my friend Herwig that I observe a Maltese cross in my case for Libyan glass (which has never been said before for LDG).



Cristobalite#1A_R.jpg
 Mineral: Cristobalite
 Locality:
Egypt - Libian Desert
 Description:
 Viewed:  3451 Time(s)

Cristobalite#1A_R.jpg



Cristobalite in LDG-1.jpg
 Mineral: Cristobalite
 Description:
XPol
 Viewed:  3449 Time(s)

Cristobalite in LDG-1.jpg



Cristobalite in LDG-1-bw.jpg
 Mineral: Cristobalite
 Description:
same pic, in BW
 Viewed:  3450 Time(s)

Cristobalite in LDG-1-bw.jpg


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
1
   

Daniel Garcia




Joined: 02 May 2022
Posts: 23
Location: Narbonne

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 09:27    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

Sorry to be unclear. What I see is that silica (chalcedony) takes the place of former gypsum lenses, growing from the faces inwards. I agree that the likely mechanisme is coupled dissolution-precipitation. Maybe replacement was not the proper term.

But my main question remains. Can we derive any inference from the treillis structure of this (chalcedony) intergrowth ? It cannot be true HT cristobalite, but at least it displays a symetry that is reminiscent of an isometric or pseudoisometric frame. Does this mean there was an isometric or amorphous precursor ?

Thanks anyway for replying



Mv13_7LP.jpg
 Mineral: chalcedony
 Dimensions: 0.5 x 1 mm
 Description:
XPL treillis structure in chalcedony (?), growing across a gypsum twin plane
 Viewed:  3445 Time(s)

Mv13_7LP.jpg


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Daniel Garcia




Joined: 02 May 2022
Posts: 23
Location: Narbonne

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 09:34    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

Peter Megaw wrote:
Robert Folk taught that length-slow chalcedony was indicative of formation under evaporitic or sulfate rich conditions. If you have a gyp plate you could check that out


Thanks, Yes I did.
Unfortunately the fibers you see in all the preceeding pictures do not have a straight extinction, hence defining an optical sign is problematic.
On the other hand, I do see in the same thin section more conventional chalcedony fibers that do have a straight extinction and a positive sign (leght slow, like quartz)
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

marco campos-venuti




Joined: 09 Apr 2014
Posts: 225
Location: Sevilla


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 10:16    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

Hi Daniel,
From the hand sample the chalcedony is spherical and I don't see any faces. From the last photo you can see chalcedony filling a cavity inside a gypsum crystal, but I still don't see any faces.
If you are looking for a replacement, the original crystal must be in disequilibrium and in your case the gypsum is not in disequilibrium so you don't have a replacement of gypsum, but only filling a cavity in the gypsum. It could also be a primary cavity of the gypsum or a grain included in the gypsum and then dissolved.
However, an evaporite is an alkaline environment and therefore it would be good for CT-opal to precipitate which is amorphous and is often confused with cristobalite, as in the case of Roger's LDG.. Then the opal is replaced by chalcedony later when the chemistry becomes acidic.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Daniel Garcia




Joined: 02 May 2022
Posts: 23
Location: Narbonne

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 11:13    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

marco campos-venuti wrote:
Hi Daniel,
From the hand sample the chalcedony is spherical and I don't see any faces. From the last photo you can see chalcedony filling a cavity inside a gypsum crystal, but I still don't see any faces.
If you are looking for a replacement, the original crystal must be in disequilibrium and in your case the gypsum is not in disequilibrium so you don't have a replacement of gypsum, but only filling a cavity in the gypsum. It could also be a primary cavity of the gypsum or a grain included in the gypsum and then dissolved.
However, an evaporite is an alkaline environment and therefore it would be good for CT-opal to precipitate which is amorphous and is often confused with cristobalite, as in the case of Roger's LDG.. Then the opal is replaced by chalcedony later when the chemistry becomes acidic.


Hence you suggest a CT-opal precursor ?
And the chalcedony inheriting some of the short range organization of its precursor ?

Concerning the question of gypsum replacement vs silica filling a former cavity, I will not argue further on, the question seems a bit academic. I was'nt there when it occured.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

alfredo
Site Admin



Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 1011


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 08, 2025 21:34    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

Thank you, gentlemen, for this interesting discussion. I observed very similar looking millimeter-size spherules in gypsum in Archidona, Spain: https://www.mindat.org/loc-257672.html - and I had been wondering how they formed.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

marco campos-venuti




Joined: 09 Apr 2014
Posts: 225
Location: Sevilla


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 09, 2025 06:32    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

Hi Alfredo,
perhaps you are referring to the gypsum of Mina Rica, Pulpì, Almeria, Spain, where gypsum crystals show inclusions of celestine needles and white spherulites. In my opinion, in that case they are bacterial colonies. I have found similar ones in some quartz (see my book "Biominerals"). Dissolution spherulites are common in glass (pitting) and in some microcrystalline silica, but I don't know if they are possible in crystalline material.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Daniel Garcia




Joined: 02 May 2022
Posts: 23
Location: Narbonne

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Apr 09, 2025 11:50    Post subject: Re: cristobalite vs chalcedony in thin section  

Thanks everybody for feedback and suggestions.
Let me add some more pictures of chalcedony flowers growing inside gypsum cristals from the same evaporite formation.
Incidentally, Marco, it seems that growth from a face is not the most common case ; very often, a carbonate impurity, a wood fragment or another undetermined inclusion in the gypsum may serve as a nucleation center for the chalcedony flower.



Mv13_5LP.jpg
 Mineral: chalcedony
 Dimensions: 1.5 x 2 mm
 Description:
XPL chalcedony flower growing in gypsum.
Chalcedony is in contact with native sulfur on the left and growth against gypsum on the right
 Viewed:  2958 Time(s)

Mv13_5LP.jpg



Mv13_4LN.jpg
 Mineral: chalcedony
 Dimensions: 1.5 x 2 mm
 Description:
PPL view, of chalcedony growing in gypsum, native sulfur on the left
 Viewed:  2959 Time(s)

Mv13_4LN.jpg



Mv7_10LP.jpg
 Mineral: chalcedony
 Dimensions: 1.5 x 2 mm
 Description:
XPL view, chalcedony in gypsum
 Viewed:  2962 Time(s)

Mv7_10LP.jpg



Mv7_10LN.jpg
 Mineral: chalcedony
 Dimensions: 1.5 x 2 mm
 Description:
PPL view, chalcedony in gypsum
 Viewed:  2968 Time(s)

Mv7_10LN.jpg



Mv7_8LP.jpg
 Mineral: chalcedony
 Dimensions: 0.5 x 0.5 mm
 Description:
XPL view ; note carbonate or clay impurity in the core of the chalcedony
 Viewed:  2959 Time(s)

Mv7_8LP.jpg



Mv7_8LN.jpg
 Mineral: chalcedony
 Dimensions: 0.5 x 0.5 mm
 Description:
PPL view
 Viewed:  2959 Time(s)

Mv7_8LN.jpg


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   
Display posts from previous:   
   Index -> Minerals and Mineralogy   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 2
  Goto page 1, 2  Next  

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


All pictures, text, design © Forum FMF 2006-2025


Powered by FMF