We use cookies to show content based on your preferences. If you continue to browse you accept their use and installation. More information. >


FMF - Friends of Minerals Forum, discussion and message board
The place to share your mineralogical experiences


Spanish message board






Newest topics and users posts
04 Jul-04:35:07 Re: silvia's collection (Herwig)
04 Jul-03:56:03 Re: silvia's collection (James Catmur)
03 Jul-22:42:04 The mizunaka collection - fluorite (Am Mizunaka)
03 Jul-15:16:58 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
03 Jul-13:28:16 Re: some rare phosphates from the democratic republic of congo and zimbabwe (Roger Warin)
03 Jul-11:14:11 Re: collection of michael shaw (Carles Millan)
03 Jul-10:12:23 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
02 Jul-17:01:48 Some facts about uranium minerals (Silvia)
02 Jul-16:59:28 Uraninite on the alligator (Silvia)
02 Jul-16:40:02 The forgotten mines (Silvia)
02 Jul-16:04:59 The mizunaka collection - spessartine (Am Mizunaka)
02 Jul-14:07:28 Re: collection of michael shaw (Michael Shaw)
02 Jul-13:38:52 Cuprite on calcite from congo d. R. / #mvm (minerals - virtual museum) collection (Jordi Fabre)
02 Jul-10:23:30 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Craig Hagstrom)
02 Jul-10:06:48 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Marco Campos-venuti)
02 Jul-09:29:48 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Craig Hagstrom)
02 Jul-09:12:17 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Marco Campos-venuti)
02 Jul-09:02:38 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Craig Hagstrom)
02 Jul-08:49:56 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Marco Campos-venuti)
02 Jul-06:09:25 Re: libyan desert glass structure (James Catmur)
01 Jul-14:47:07 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Alfredo)
01 Jul-09:55:00 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Craig Hagstrom)
01 Jul-05:05:41 Re: libyan desert glass structure (Roger Warin)
01 Jul-01:07:57 The mizunaka collection - elbaite (Am Mizunaka)
30 Jun-21:33:59 Re: some rare phosphates from the democratic republic of congo and zimbabwe (Roger Warin)

For lists of newest topics and postings click here


RSS RSS

View unanswered posts

Why and how to register

Index Index
 FAQFAQ RegisterRegister  Log inLog in
 {Forgotten your password?}Forgotten your password?  

Like
122512


The time now is Jul 04, 2025 06:55

Search for a textSearch for a text   

A general guide for using the Forum with some rules and tips
The information provided within this Forum about localities is only given to allow reference to them. Any visit to any of the localities requires you to obtain full permission and relevant information prior to your visit. FMF is strictly against any illicit activities related to collecting minerals.
New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014
  Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
  Index -> The Mineralogical Record
Like


View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

John S. White
Site Admin



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1298
Location: Stewartstown, Pennsylvania, USA


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 24, 2014 20:18    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

One of the purposes of the article was to open up a dialogue around this subject, and that seems to have been successful, judging from the response to the article on this Forum, something that really could not have occurred without the Forum. I am not surprised that we appear to have missed at least one viable candidate for inclusion as I am inclined to agree with Les that the Bolivian vivianites certainly satisfy the requirements for inclusion. The same may be said for ilvaites from China, they do indeed appear to be worthy and I have no idea how we missed them. I have already commented on the copper pseudomorphs after cuprite, I will only add that perhaps they were missed because they are pseudomorphs and perhaps we never even considered including a pseudomorph, I have no idea.
_________________
John S. White
aka Rondinaire
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

GneissWare




Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 1287
Location: California


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 24, 2014 20:30    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

John,
As Les said, its a moving target, and no matter what you list, new things are always appearing, and old finds are disappearing. These kinds of lists are also very much products of their time--what may interest some folks today, like the Huanggang material, may be largely discounted later.

Thanks for taking a crack at putting any kind of list together!
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jesse Fisher




Joined: 18 Mar 2009
Posts: 639
Location: San Francisco


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 24, 2014 20:51    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

While I wouldn't consider myself a connoisseur of the species, it seems to me that the best of the vanadinites that have been coming from Mibladen, Morocco for the last I don't know how many years are much better (and more numerous) than from other past occurrences. I know other good vanadinites have come from Arizona, so perhaps Les will have something to say about this.

Cheers!



Vanadinite-6859r.jpg
 Description:
vanadinite on Baryte
Mibladen, Meknes-Tafilalet Region, Morocco
5x4x3 cm overall size
 Viewed:  73103 Time(s)

Vanadinite-6859r.jpg


Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

alfredo
Site Admin



Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 1013


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 24, 2014 21:34    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

While speaking of Rubtsovskoe and Huanggang, they have also set new standards for marshite and borcarite respectively.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

bob kerr




Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Posts: 638
Location: Monroeville PA


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 24, 2014 21:35    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

not to speak for john/tom but the Moroccan vanadinites as well as the Tasmanian crocoites were covered in Bancrft's book so they were not included in their article.

concerning the bolivian vivianites - that I immediately fell in love with when I first saw them; for those of us who live in high humidity areas (like pretty much the entire east coast) learn from the voice of experience. these are simply NOT stable - especially the matrix if it has any pyrite in it - which most do.

first the pyrite will decrepit forming some sulfuric acid along the way then the vivianite will start to peal off or split in layers. I watched my wonderful - and expensive - specimen effectively disappear before my very eyes.

should a specimen that's unstable be included here? I would vote no but others who've bought these that I know from AZ have not seen the decomposition.

yet another issue to consider on this challenging list.

bob
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jesse Fisher




Joined: 18 Mar 2009
Posts: 639
Location: San Francisco


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 24, 2014 22:29    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

I have looked through the original book and am unable to find a vanadinite (from anywhere) in it.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

alfredo
Site Admin



Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 1013


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 24, 2014 22:46    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

Of course ALL vivianites are unstable in the presence of light or heat, whether or not from Bolivia, and whether or not associated with pyrite. I recommend keeping them in a cool dark place, wherever they are from. Sometimes one can get Bolivian ones sitting on siderite or wavellite rather than pyrite, so that helps with the acidity problem.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 5071
Location: Barcelona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 25, 2014 04:03    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

bob kerr wrote:
...should a specimen that's unstable be included here? I would vote no but others who've bought these that I know from AZ have not seen the decomposition....

Although it is true that in very dry climates like in AZ the vivianites seems to maintain, I would not add them to the list considering their tendency to decay and decompose. Even if you live in AZ (or similar) if some day you move to a higher humidity place, then the vivianite will probably "die" so, for a so serious list, I believe it is better not to encourage people to consider the vivianites as one of the "you must have in your collection" by its instability, but... the realgar is already in the article's list, so...
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Peter Megaw
Site Admin



Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 973
Location: Tucson, Arizona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 25, 2014 08:28    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

So, does accessibility to a collector matter?

I would argue that the Gypsum (var. selenite...sensu strictu) from the Cave of the Giants at Naica as another example of completely resetting the bar...and although they are probably both at least somewhat unstable if removed from the cave, we will never know since they are virtually impossible to remove given their sheer size. I believe Bancroft mentioned the Cave of the Swords in the original...but these render the CoS crystals insignificant.

I also think the cassiterites and scheelites from Pingwu, China are worthy candidates for NSE.

_________________
Siempre Adelante!
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

bob kerr




Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Posts: 638
Location: Monroeville PA


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 25, 2014 10:08    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

Jesse Fisher wrote:
I have looked through the original book and am unable to find a vanadinite (from anywhere) in it.

I would think John and Tom automatically assumed that the Moroccan vanadinites were already included in the Bancroft book. But these vanadinites certainly belong on the top of this list as the second best vanadinite locality (probably the North Geronimo Mine in AZ) just doesn't compete.

bob
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

bob kerr




Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Posts: 638
Location: Monroeville PA


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 25, 2014 10:16    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

I note in the MR article that "new species from a single find" like olmiite are not included. i guess I would argue that they should be included as this find "sets the bar" from which all past and future finds should be compared - even if there was no previous finds.

And while i'm on Africa - I would also lobby for the sturmanites and ettringites from N'Chwaning as candidates for inclusion on the list.

bob
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Jordi Fabre
Overall coordinator of the Forum



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 5071
Location: Barcelona


Access to the FMF Gallery title=

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 25, 2014 10:19    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

bob kerr wrote:
....but these vandinites certainly belong on the top of this list as the second best vanadinite locality (probably the North Geronimo Mine in AZ) just doesn't compete.

Familiar with the Moroccan vanadinites as well as the North Geronimo/Pure Potential vanadinites through the specimens bought by Sr. Folch in US in the 50s-60s. I should say that the difference is gigantic.
One reason for a kind of lower visibility of the Moroccan ones could be that they are so fragile that not too many arrive in the US, but if you take a look in many European collections...
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Les Presmyk




Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 372
Location: Gilbert, AZ

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 25, 2014 10:57    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

The Moroccan vanadinites are the finest in the world. While Arizona localities may have held that title for decades, this has not been the case for the past 40 years. North Geronimo/Pure Potential is probably Arizona's best vanadinite locality, followed by the Old Yuma Mine and then the Apache Mine.

As we were doing research for our book, it was interesting to read the old ads for minerals. In 1890, when vanadinites were coming out of Arizona, and what were then world-class specimens, dealers were charging up to $30 for a cabinet sized piece. Visions of large and multiple crystals attractively arranged on matrix dance in one's head. And, pieces that surely would bring thousands of dollars today because after all, $30 was a month's salary back then. This is certainly the case with the Bisbee and Morenci azurites and malachites from this era. However, you will be disappointed to see one of these vanadinites today. They are still $30 specimens and only if someone wants the old label or a bit of history.

Sturmanite and Ettrigite are certainly contenders for the list. What about Chinese scheelites? The Chinese scheelites are certainly heads and shoulders above Korea (color and size), the Morro Vehlo gold mine in Brazil (size) and even Arizona, although this locality is the closest one in terms of size and color.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Les Presmyk




Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 372
Location: Gilbert, AZ

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 25, 2014 11:05    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

To Peter Megaw's recommendations, if vivianite and other minerals that are not stable in certain environments are disqualified, then there should also be criteria that limits the size to something that can be collected and placed in a display case. After all, the gypsum cave he refers to will someday be back under water and unavailable for viewing.

I also considered the cassiterites from China but they are not a significant step up, at least using the MR article criteria, from the great cassiterites from Araca, Bolivia.
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   

Susan Robinson




Joined: 05 Aug 2010
Posts: 163
Location: Hancock, MI

View user's profile

Send private message

PostPosted: Mar 25, 2014 12:59    Post subject: Re: New Standards of Excellence in the Mineral Kingdom - M.R. March-April 2014  

I would think the antimony crystals found at the Lake George Antimony mine, Lake George, New Brunswick, Canada, would certainly qualify?
_________________
Susan Robinson
Back to top
Reply to topic Reply with quote
Like
   
Display posts from previous:   
   Index -> The Mineralogical Record   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 2 of 3
  Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next  

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


All pictures, text, design © Forum FMF 2006-2025


Powered by FMF